Urgent Call for Global Shift to a “Nature Positive” Approach in New Paper

Immediate call for global action to adopt a "nature positive" approach published in Frontiers in Science.
Halting and reversing biodiversity loss by 2030 critical to avoid disastrous effects on human well-being
Image: Flathead River Valley in Fall, copyright Harvey Locke

New scientific findings call for an urgent global shift towards a “nature positive” approach to counteract the alarming decline in biodiversity.

A recently published study in Frontiers in Science underscores the critical need to address the ongoing loss of biodiversity, which threatens to destabilize Earth’s crucial systems supporting human life.

The research advocates for a comprehensive change in global environmental strategies, urging that nature positive goals be given equal priority alongside climate and developmental objectives. According to lead author Harvey Locke, from the Nature Positive initiative and the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, this involves creating unified agreements that integrate human development, climate, biodiversity, and ocean preservation.

The diminishing biodiversity, primarily driven by human activities, disrupts natural processes essential for human prosperity. This includes increased risks to human health, such as the spread of infectious diseases linked to ecosystem disruptions, and adverse impacts on mental health. The paper further explains that biodiversity has a significant impact on rainfall patterns critical to agriculture and water supply.

Locke emphasizes, “We must act now to halt and reverse the loss of nature by 2030 toward achieving an integrated equitable, nature positive, and carbon neutral future.”

Enhancing Biodiversity Conservation

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), adopted at COP15 in 2022, aims to curb and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. However, the study critiques its lack of focus on natural processes. The authors present a critical evaluation of the GBF targets, highlighting gaps in addressing large-scale processes like biome function, hydrology, and species migration.

The researchers propose specific actions and metrics that align biodiversity conservation with climate stabilization, freshwater system security, ocean conservation, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Co-author Prof Johan Rockström from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) stresses the impossibility of achieving climate and development goals without preserving nature’s integrity. “Our findings emphasize the vital importance of immediately halting the loss of remaining intact biomes and ecosystems, which are irreplaceable and cannot be quickly restored,” he stated.

Prioritizing Indigenous and Local Knowledge

The paper stresses integrating Indigenous and local knowledge systems with scientific methods to achieve effective conservation results. Co-author Prof Leroy Little Bear from the University of Lethbridge in Canada highlights that Indigenous perspectives tie the existence of humans to the entirety of the environment, involving both biotic and abiotic processes.

“Indigenous knowledge and practices inherently reflect what Western science calls ‘biotic and abiotic processes’ and are rooted in a deep sense of responsibility to the living world,” he noted. This integration is crucial for realizing the nature positive ambitions.

Global Goals for Nature

The study calls for nature positive goals to be prioritized alongside international climate and developmental goals. Prof Raina K. Plowright from Cornell University asserts that global policies to safeguard intact nature and rehabilitate damaged ecosystems should be on par with climate action under the Paris Agreement and human development SDGs.

Such prioritization is vital for reducing disease spread and securing global health. Achieving these goals requires economic systems that respect natural limits, conserve ecosystems, and support equitable human development. The paper concludes that effective conservation efforts and socio-economic shifts towards positive environmental outcomes are necessary.

Locke concludes, “Too often biodiversity is seen as a ‘nice-to-have’ luxury that takes second place to so-called ‘real world’ concerns about the economy and human development. We show that this is a fundamental misunderstanding of reality. Biodiversity at all scales is integral to the functioning of the planet (including the climate system and freshwater). It is therefore both vital to human well-being, and the context for all economic activity.”

For more insights, the article is featured in the Frontiers in Science multimedia hub Nature Positive: restoring Earth system stability.

Original Story at www.frontiersin.org