UK Government Departments Opt for Cheaper Fossil Fuels over Green Energy

Ed Miliband’s department relies on fossil fuels despite advocating renewables, highlighting governmental inconsistency.
The Times & The Sunday Times

UK Government’s Energy Practices: A Clash Between Policy and Practice

Despite the push for renewable energy within the UK government, several key departments, including the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, are primarily powered by fossil fuels. This revelation comes from Freedom of Information (FoI) requests sent to over 400 public sector bodies, which have uncovered a preference for cheaper “brown” energy tariffs over “green” energy deals in many government offices.

One notable response came from an agency under Ed Miliband’s department, which cited poor value for money as the reason for not adopting renewable tariffs. The findings highlight that over 80% of electricity consumption by Whitehall comes from a “brown” power mix, largely reliant on fossil fuels, including the gas-fired heating system at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’s headquarters.

In contrast, approximately half of UK councils have committed to “green” or “no carbon” energy tariffs, despite the higher costs associated with renewable and nuclear power sources. Critics argue this situation exposes a significant contradiction in the UK’s net-zero strategy, as local councils seem more aligned with government climate goals than central departments.

The UK’s net-zero strategy aims to decarbonize all sectors by 2050, with ministers frequently expressing the ambition to establish Britain as a “clean energy superpower.” Ed Miliband has emphasized the need for large companies to align with net-zero objectives, urging businesses to adopt carbon-reduction strategies.

Despite these aspirations, the energy department admitted to The Times that its central London headquarters relies on the “UK grid supply mix,” a blend where over one-third is generated from fossil fuels. The Mining Remediation Authority, another department agency, reported spending £8.5 million on standard grid electricity, arguing this approach offers the best value for taxpayers.

Other departments, such as the Foreign Office, the Ministry of Defence, and the Department for Work and Pensions, also utilize “brown” power. The Crown Commercial Service, responsible for public sector procurement, allows bodies to choose green energy, yet many opt for cheaper alternatives.

The website of the Crown Commercial Service highlights the urgent need to address climate change and encourages shifting to renewable energy sources, emphasizing the potential benefits of new renewable capacity development. However, the cost of green tariffs, which can add 2% to 4% to energy bills, remains a deterrent for some public bodies.

Corin Dalby, CEO of Box Power, which compiled the FoI requests, criticized the government’s energy policy, stating: “The data demonstrates hypocrisy at the heart of the government’s energy policy.” Dalby highlighted the government’s contradictory stance on promoting green power while opting for fossil fuels internally.

The FoI responses also revealed skepticism about the effectiveness and authenticity of green tariffs. Some public bodies, like Police Scotland, questioned the true impact of “renewable energy guarantees of origin” (Rego) deals, which match consumption with renewable production but do not ensure direct renewable supply.

Conversely, institutions such as the Bank of England and the City of London Corporation have embraced Rego-backed tariffs, aligning with the government’s net-zero targets. The lack of consistent guidance on weighing green-tariff premiums amid the decarbonization of the national grid remains a point of contention.

When asked about the value of public bodies investing in green power, the Department for Energy did not respond directly. Instead, it reiterated its goal of achieving a 95% clean electricity grid by 2030, emphasizing the investment in clean energy to shield the public sector from volatile fossil fuel markets.

Nonetheless, the Mining Remediation Authority maintains its approach of using a standard energy mix while focusing on energy reduction and generating its own renewable energy to maximize taxpayer value.

Original Story at www.thetimes.com