As 2025 unfolds, the United States is witnessing a significant shift in its environmental policies under President Trump’s administration. The year began with the country stepping away from the Paris Agreement, marking the beginning of a series of actions aimed at dismantling climate change initiatives. This administration has systematically rolled back emissions standards, halted offshore wind projects, opened previously protected lands for fossil fuel extraction, and reversed key components of the Inflation Reduction Act. By November, these reversals had led to the cancellation of clean energy projects worth $32 billion and the loss of 40,000 jobs in the sector.
These changes pose significant challenges to the transition towards clean energy, entrenching fossil fuel dependence for the foreseeable future. However, the most profound impact may be the undermining of the scientific framework that underpins climate change understanding and policy-making. The Trump administration’s actions, including the defunding of research programs, closure of scientific institutions, and layoffs of experts, have disrupted the nation’s climate science infrastructure, potentially impacting American competitiveness long-term.
The U.S. appears to be eroding its capacity to tackle climate change, yielding leadership in the clean energy sector to global competitors such as China. In 2025 alone, over 3,800 research grants were canceled, pulling $3 billion from active research funding. This abrupt termination has left numerous research projects in limbo, with teams facing unemployment and potential breakthroughs lost. Political influence has increasingly affected scientific funding, particularly in climate science, as fossil fuel interests hold sway. Key federal agencies have seen climate experts dismissed, the National Climate Assessment terminated, and critical climate data removed from government sites. The planned closure of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a pivotal entity for climate modeling, exemplifies the administration’s stance on climate issues.
The consequences extend beyond current research efforts, threatening the future of climate science in the United States. Universities have reduced PhD admissions, paused student offers, and cut fellowships, while early career researchers face funding instability. This uncertainty is prompting a reevaluation among aspiring climate scientists, who are reconsidering their career paths in a politically volatile environment. Reports of scientists contemplating moves to more supportive countries further underscore the crisis. As the U.S. drives away its scientific talent, China is investing heavily in research, positioning itself to dominate the global clean technology market.
Despite these federal setbacks, resilience at the state and institutional levels remains strong. Some universities have initiated legal action to counter funding cuts, and have leveraged endowments to maintain critical research. Climate coalitions consisting of states and academic institutions continue to make strides, achieving net emission reductions of 24% below 2005 levels while bolstering local economies. States committed to clean energy have significantly reduced electricity sector emissions and established binding clean electricity standards to secure their progress.
The long-term impact of Trump’s policies on American climate science will be significant, with lost opportunities and diminished global standing. However, the persistent efforts of states, cities, and universities highlight a resilient drive towards climate progress. Sustaining this momentum is crucial as the nation waits for federal policies to realign with climate realities.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
Original Story at english.elpais.com