California Poised for Solar Transformation with New Legislation
In a significant move to enhance solar accessibility, California lawmakers have approved two critical bills aimed at expanding solar energy options for renters and condo residents. These legislative efforts come as a response to the challenges faced by individuals who lack the means or space for traditional rooftop solar installations.
On Sunday, the passage of Assembly Bill 1813 marked a pivotal step in establishing a more inclusive community solar program. This initiative enables residents to subscribe to a local solar array, offering a discounted monthly rate on their electricity bills. “California’s clean energy transition should benefit everyone, not just those who can afford rooftop solar,” stated Assemblymember Chris Ward (D-San Diego), the bill’s author.
In a parallel development, the state legislature also passed Senate Bill 868, thereby legalizing “balcony solar” or plug-in solar systems. This innovation allows individuals to install small solar panels on patios or fences, plugging them directly into wall outlets to reduce electricity costs. Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), who sponsored the bill, remarked, “It’s an idea whose time has come,” highlighting the potential for substantial savings on utility bills.
Despite these advancements, the path for rooftop solar in California has been fraught with challenges, primarily due to utility companies’ opposition. The state’s earlier leadership in solar energy experienced a setback in 2022 when incentives were significantly reduced by the Public Utilities Commission under Governor Gavin Newsom. Utilities had argued that higher compensation for rooftop solar unfairly shifted infrastructure maintenance costs to non-solar users.
This year, similar arguments were made against the new community and balcony solar bills. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) successfully advocated for an expiration date in SB 868, requiring reauthorization by 2030 if enacted. PG&E spokeswoman Lynsey Paulo emphasized the need for clear safety standards, stating, “We believe customers and emergency personnel deserve the protections that come from clear safety standards and established interconnection processes from the outset.”
Both bills now await Governor Newsom’s signature. If approved, the balcony solar bill will be implemented following safety certification by a recognized U.S. testing laboratory. Although these panels are already certified in Germany, advocates expect U.S. approval soon. However, the community solar reform might face hurdles given the Public Utilities Commission’s historical opposition.
Investor-owned utilities have consistently opposed AB 1813, arguing it would impose financial burdens on non-participating customers. PG&E’s Paulo criticized the bill, saying, “This legislation is about profits for solar companies, not customer affordability.” The Public Advocates Office echoed these concerns, cautioning against cost shifts that could raise monthly bills by an average of $12 for non-participants.
Contrarily, Ward and supporters, including environmental groups and solar developers, contend that expanding community solar will ultimately lower costs for all. Citing studies, Ward suggests widespread community solar adoption could save ratepayers $6.5 billion by reducing dependence on gas generation and electricity imports.
Additionally, the legislature approved Senate Bill 913, allowing consumer-owned devices like batteries and electric vehicles to be aggregated as reliable power sources for the state grid. Brandon Garcia of Advanced Energy United praised this decision, stating it would alleviate grid pressure and maintain affordable energy prices by enabling consumer resources to compete effectively.
Original Story at www.latimes.com