New Mexico Investigates Alleged Fraud in Project Jupiter Public Comments
Allegations of fraudulent public comments have prompted New Mexico’s Attorney General Raúl Torrez to launch an investigation into the Project Jupiter data center. Concerns have arisen that written support for the air quality permit application may have been submitted using residents’ names without their consent.
According to a Source NM report, individuals in several New Mexico cities reported unauthorized use of their names and emails to endorse the project. Many claimed they were approached by canvassers wearing Project Jupiter attire. Moreover, some elected officials have noted similar misuse of their personal information.
State Representative Cristina Parajón (D-Albuquerque) disclosed that her official legislative email was used in one such letter, suggesting potential impersonation of a government official.
The comment period for the permit, filed by Yucca Growth Infrastructure, concluded recently. In response, New Mexico Department of Justice’s Chief of Civil Affairs, Billy Jimenez, highlighted the gravity of the complaints, emphasizing the need to protect the integrity of the permit process. “We have reason to believe that an unknown, but potentially substantial number of the comments were fraudulently submitted without the consent or knowledge of the individuals named,” Jimenez stated.
Jimenez requested full cooperation from the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) and urged them to critically assess the comments for any irregularities.
The NMED has yet to issue a response regarding the ongoing investigation.
The New Mexico Department of Justice has invited residents to report unauthorized use of their identities through an online complaint portal or by calling 505-490-4060. Torrez emphasized the importance of authentic public participation, stating, “If individuals or organizations attempted to manipulate the public comment process through fraudulent submissions, we will investigate those actions thoroughly and hold responsible parties accountable.”
Oracle has expressed support for the investigation. In a statement to Source NM, the company affirmed its commitment to the integrity of the public comment process. “It is in everyone’s best interest to ensure that only legitimate public input is part of the public record,” an Oracle spokesperson stated, assuring continued scrutiny of questioned comments.
Original Story at sourcenm.com