US Climate Congress Shifts Stance at COP29

With a president-elect focused on dismantling climate gains, US allies at COP29 emphasize economics over morality.
The US delegation's booth at COP29

US Climate Allies Focus on Economics Amid Political Shift

SIERRA-Julia

Fri, 2024-11-15 09:24

The US delegation's booth at COP29

At COP29, the US has a comparatively tiny presence. Biden is absent, overshadowed by Trump’s plans to expand fossil fuel use and rescind funds from the Inflation Reduction Act. | Photo by Nour Ghantous

 

Nov 15 2024

The United States’ climate leaders arrived in Baku, Azerbaijan, for COP29 negotiations on climate financing. With President Joe Biden’s predecessor, a climate skeptic, set to return to office, the US delegation’s message is uncertain.

The US delegation can highlight Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which has inspired other countries, like Canada, to implement their own climate action policies. Domestically, the IRA has created economic opportunities and outlines a path for emissions reduction, aiming to cut US greenhouse gas emissions by 50-52% by 2030.

President-elect Trump has pledged to rescind IRA funds and expand oil and gas licensing, potentially withdrawing again from the Paris Agreement. This contrasts with the US’s role in the 2015 Paris Agreement, which commits countries to emissions reduction plans and climate funding.

With Trump’s return looming, international delegates question US climate commitments and seek answers from the delegation.

From Moral Imperative to Economic Incentive

At COP29, US climate allies emphasize the economic benefits of climate action over moral imperatives. The focus is on the financial gains from clean energy investments and the cost efficiency of mitigating climate disasters. Conversations at the conference support this, noting Biden’s campaign could have highlighted the IRA’s financial benefits more effectively.

The IRA has created jobs and investments, with 85% of new projects and 68% of jobs in red states. A report by US advocacy group E2 indicates nearly 110,000 new jobs and $126 billion in investment in 40 states, with many projects in Republican-led areas.

Climate allies hope the financial benefits of the IRA will be too significant for the incoming administration to ignore.

The States May Take the Reins

Under Trump, states may need to fill a potential federal leadership gap on climate action. California’s environmental secretary, Yana Garcia, defended the state’s efforts at COP29 and noted potential legal action against federal decisions.

Garcia countered claims that US climate progress is at risk, emphasizing California’s commitment to its environmental agenda. She highlighted the economic opportunities of the IRA and called dismantling it a “deep mistake.”

According to 2020 data, California is the second-largest greenhouse-gas-emitting state in the US but is also heavily impacted by climate change, facing extreme heat, wildfires, and poor air quality.

Weathering Changing Political Winds

Biden’s climate advisor, Ali Zaidi, expressed confidence in states, cities, and the private sector recognizing the economic opportunities from clean energy. The US delegation at COP29 emphasizes that the financial rewards from clean energy investments are too significant to undo, warning that dismantling the IRA would harm both environmental and economic opportunities.

Zaidi noted the potential of the crisis to expand manufacturing, uplift communities, and deliver clean air and water. The shift from climate morality to economic pragmatism is seen as a counter to potential rollbacks of climate progress. The IRA’s impact spans emissions reductions, job creation, and international influence, with hopes that these outcomes will persist beyond the current administration.

As COP29 continues, the future of American climate policy remains crucial, influencing global climate action and finance.

Original Story at www.sierraclub.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.