Potential Impact of a Second Trump Presidency on Protest and Dissent Freedoms

Experts warn a second Trump presidency may escalate threats to free speech, with concerns about militarized responses to dissent.
U.S. Capitol Police arrest a climate activist during a protest on Capitol Hill in 2021. Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Experts warn that a second Donald Trump presidency could amplify threats to free speech and protest freedoms. Concerns focus on Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric and past actions, such as deploying federal agents against Black Lives Matter protests in 2020.

Trump has often vowed to use the military to suppress dissent, describing political opponents as “the enemy from within” (source). John Langford, a First Amendment lawyer with Protect Democracy, highlighted Trump’s history of suppressing dissent as indicative of a democratic decline.

Criticism comes from varied quarters, including Trump’s former chief of staff, John Kelly, who labeled Trump as potentially fascistic. Thirteen former Trump officials support Kelly’s assessment (source).

The crackdown on U.S. protest freedoms is also driven by state laws, corporate influence, and lawsuits targeting climate activists. However, Trump’s rhetoric might create a hostile environment for dissent, sparking fears among climate groups.

A recent Supreme Court ruling granting former presidents immunity for actions within their constitutional duties intensifies concerns over executive overreach. Charlie Cray from Greenpeace notes the court’s support could enable Trump to wield excessive power.

Executive Overreach and Chilling Dissent

The ACLU released memos analyzing potential civil liberties impacts under Trump and Harris administrations, highlighting Trump’s previous executive overreach (source). ACLU director Anthony Romero contrasted the two administrations, emphasizing differing impacts on fundamental rights.

Russell Vought, a Trump ally, has suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy the military against protesters. The act’s vague language grants sweeping presidential discretion, raising concerns about civil liberties, according to Joseph Nunn of the Brennan Center for Justice.

Ben Wizner of the ACLU warned that Trump’s unpredictability necessitates preparing for extreme scenarios. His previous presidency faced internal resistance to extreme measures, but a compliant administration could alter this dynamic.

SLAPP Suits and Legal Persecution

Climate activists face increasing legal challenges, such as costly lawsuits and accusations of domestic terrorism. Greenpeace is contesting a $300 million lawsuit from Energy Transfer, which they argue is a SLAPP suit aimed at stifling dissent.

SLAPP suits are designed to burden activists with legal fees, and there is a growing need for stronger anti-SLAPP protections, including federal laws to defend protesters, according to Wizner. Currently, anti-SLAPP legislation exists in 34 states and D.C.

Energy Transfer, a top Trump donor, exemplifies the close ties between fossil fuel interests and political figures. Critics warn of increased threats to environmental advocacy under a potential Trump administration.

Critical Infrastructure and Protest Legislation

Several states have passed laws curbing protest freedoms, often influenced by fossil fuel industry proposals. These laws target demonstrations at “critical infrastructure” sites, such as oil facilities (source).

Nick Robinson from the ICNL noted these laws often emerge in response to social movements, with precedents set during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. The fossil fuel industry’s influence is a primary threat to protest freedoms, says organizer Russell Chisholm.

Despite bipartisan support for anti-protest laws, activists highlight systemic issues where political figures prioritize industry interests over community welfare. Juan Mancias, an opponent of natural gas projects in Texas, calls for a focus on protecting essential resources like clean water and air.

Bipartisan Threats to Protest Freedoms

While Trump is seen as a significant threat, the ACLU warns that both parties have compromised First Amendment rights. Recent laws, such as anti-BDS measures against boycotts, illustrate bipartisan tendencies to limit protest freedoms.

Environmental activists remain concerned about corporate influence on lawmakers across the political spectrum, arguing that fossil fuel money affects both Democrats and Republicans. Trump presents a more immediate threat, but systemic challenges persist regardless of administration.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

COP29 Ends Amidst Criticism Over Loopholes and Disunity


The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) concluded with widespread criticism over perceived loopholes and a lack of unity among participating nations. Environmental experts and activists expressed concerns that the agreements reached may be insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis.



Despite initial optimism, the conference, held in Bonn, Germany, was marked by intense debates and disagreements. Key issues included carbon emission reduction targets and financial commitments to developing countries. Many attendees felt these discussions fell short of meaningful progress. Learn more about the UN’s climate change efforts here.



A significant point of contention was the establishment of clear guidelines for monitoring and reporting emissions. Critics argue that the absence of stringent measures allows countries to exploit loopholes, undermining global efforts to curb climate change. The lack of consensus on this issue highlights the challenges in achieving cohesive international action.



Some developing nations voiced frustration over inadequate financial support from wealthier countries, which they argue is essential for implementing sustainable practices and mitigating climate impacts. This financial gap remains a major obstacle, fueling discontent and hampering collaborative efforts. Explore the Green Climate Fund’s role in supporting climate action.



Meanwhile, environmental groups emphasized the need for immediate and robust action, warning that delays could have catastrophic implications. They called for greater transparency and accountability in future agreements, urging nations to prioritize the planet’s health over economic interests.



As COP29 ends, the international community faces the challenge of bridging divides and enhancing cooperation to effectively combat climate change. Stakeholders are now looking ahead to future conferences, hoping for more decisive action and unity.

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.