Creation Covenant Alliance

Polling Reveals Split Among Pennsylvania Voters on Fracking Issue

A poll shows Pennsylvania voters are divided on fracking, favoring more regulations with energy issues low on priorities.
With Independence Hall in the background, a crowd of people hold signs with messages including

With Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, fracking in Pennsylvania has become a focal point in national discussions, especially given its potential impact on this key swing state’s election outcome. However, what do Pennsylvanians really think about fracking, and how do these views influence their presidential choice?

A recent poll of likely Pennsylvania voters, commissioned by the Ohio River Valley Institute, addresses these questions. The survey results indicate that although opinions on fracking are divided, a majority supports stronger regulations on the natural gas industry. The findings also suggest that energy and natural gas issues are not top priorities for voters, contrary to some national narratives.

When asked about their primary voting motivations, Pennsylvanians prioritized jobs, border security, preserving democracy, reproductive rights, and tax cuts over climate change and energy costs.

Fracking remains a contentious issue in Pennsylvania, with partisan divides. Fifty-one percent of voters support fracking, 30 percent oppose it, and 19 percent are undecided. Among Republicans, 81 percent favor investing in fracking and pipeline development, while only 43 percent of Democrats agree. Support is strongest near Pittsburgh, a hub for the fracking industry.

Despite only 42 percent supporting a complete fracking ban, figures like Donald Trump and Senate candidate Dave McCormick use this issue to portray Democratic rivals as proponents of a ban. Among independents, support for a ban drops to 38 percent.

Fifty-two percent of respondents believe that “fracking can be done safely,” conflicting with findings from the Concerned Health Professionals of New York, which highlight health risks associated with fracking. Additionally, 48 percent agree that living near fracking sites raises health risks, aligning with 2023 public health studies from the University of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Department of Health.

Christopher Borick, director of Muhlenberg College’s Institute of Public Opinion, notes the poll’s alignment with past findings: Pennsylvania, despite being the second-largest natural gas producer in the U.S., remains divided on fracking due to health and environmental concerns. He emphasizes that fracking’s economic benefits do not necessarily sway voters.

Environmental activists may find optimism in the poll’s findings of widespread bipartisan support for tougher fracking regulations. Ninety-four percent of participants support mandatory chemical disclosure, 93 percent endorse safer waste transportation, and 90 percent favor increased well setbacks from hospitals and schools.

Sean O’Leary, a senior researcher at the Ohio River Valley Institute, expresses surprise at the high demand for increased restrictions. He notes that support for regulation has risen since the institute’s previous poll three years ago, reflecting local residents’ ambivalence and firsthand experiences with fracking.

National discussions often overlook voters’ concerns about the impacts of fracking on quality of life. Although some Pennsylvanians associate fracking with economic benefits, they also recognize its disruptive effects on daily life.

The suggested regulations align with recommendations from a 2020 grand jury report by Pennsylvania’s attorney general. Proposed measures include increasing well setbacks, public chemical disclosure, and safer waste transport. None of these have been implemented yet.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024