Creation Covenant Alliance

Orsted and NJ reach a $125M settlement over abandoned offshore wind projects

Orsted, a Danish wind farm developer, has agreed to pay New Jersey $125 million to resolve claims tied to the company's cancellation of two offshore wind farms in 2025.
Orsted and NJ reach a $125M settlement over abandoned offshore wind projects, according to NBC10 Philadelphia

Orsted Settles With New Jersey Over Cancelled Wind Farms

Orsted, a Danish wind farm developer, has agreed to pay New Jersey $125 million to resolve claims tied to the company’s cancellation of two offshore wind farms in 2025. This amount is just over one-third of the original $300 million the company had promised before abandoning the projects.

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Announces Settlement

The state’s Board of Public Utilities announced on Tuesday that the claims between New Jersey and Orsted have been mutually settled. The decision follows Orsted’s move in October 2025 to abandon two planned wind farms off New Jersey’s southern coast.

The state plans to use the $125 million from the settlement to invest in wind energy facilities, component manufacturing facilities, and other clean energy programs.

Orsted’s Original Obligation

Prior to canceling the projects, Orsted had committed a $100 million guarantee to construct Ocean Wind I by the end of 2025. The company also had vowed to contribute an additional $200 million towards developing the offshore wind industry in New Jersey. However, after scrapping these projects, Orsted sought to evade its $300 million obligation, citing halted pursuit of the projects.

Company’s Reaction to Settlement

In a statement, Orsted expressed satisfaction with the settlement, noting that the agreement reflects the company’s total financial obligation to the state. The company also emphasized its eagerness to continue valuable partnerships with New Jersey stakeholders. However, the company made no comments regarding any future projects in the state.

Environmentalists’ Response to the Settlement

Jeff Tittel, a longtime environmentalist and retired president of the New Jersey Sierra Club, criticized the settlement, referring to it as a “sellout.” Tittel argued that the settlement allows Orsted to pay less than half of the original $300 million commitment, resulting in a loss for New Jersey.

As part of the announcement of the settlement, the administration of Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy disclosed other recent decisions regarding offshore wind. These include advancing the next solicitation for additional offshore wind projects from the third quarter of 2026 to the second quarter of 2025 and temporarily halting plans to coordinate power transmission planning for offshore wind projects with regional grid operator, PJM Interconnection.

Future of Offshore Wind Development in New Jersey

New Jersey currently has three preliminarily approved offshore wind projects. Despite opposition from groups arguing the projects are costly and potentially harmful to the marine environment, supporters contend they are a crucial step towards reducing the burning of fossil fuels and mitigating climate change. Protect Our Coast NJ, a local opposition group, criticized Gov. Murphy’s clean energy goals as “arbitrary and unrealistic” while applauding the decision to expedite offshore wind contracts.

Original Story at www.nbcphiladelphia.com

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024