Creation Covenant Alliance

Oil Industry Urges Trump to Overturn Key Climate Policies

America’s oil industry revealed a plan for the Trump administration that could reverse Biden's climate policies.
A view of traffic on California State Route 91 in Yorba Linda on Aug. 28. In its wish list for the incoming Trump administration, API asked to repeal the tailpipe and fuel economy standards for cars and trucks. Credit: Jeff Gritchen/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images

The American Petroleum Institute (API) unveiled a five-point policy plan for the incoming Trump administration on Tuesday, proposing to eliminate several Biden-era climate initiatives. The proposal surfaced during the global United Nations climate conference, yet it notably omits any mention of “climate change.” While the document asserts a commitment to emission reductions, its recommendations could hinder efforts to achieve this goal.

Central to API’s agenda is the repeal of tailpipe and fuel economy standards for vehicles, a significant source of U.S. carbon emissions. The plan also seeks to rescind a waiver permitting California and 12 other states to impose stricter vehicle regulations, aiming to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles.

API’s demands include a new five-year strategy to expand offshore oil and gas drilling leases and reversing Biden’s restrictions on new drilling on public lands. Additionally, the industry calls for expedited natural gas export permits, a process slowed by the current administration to assess climate impact.

A major request involves abolishing a methane emission fee, recently confirmed by the Biden administration. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is a primary component of natural gas, often released during oil and gas production.

API CEO Mike Sommers stated intentions to lobby Congress for energy project permitting reforms and to maintain the corporate tax benefits established in 2017. Sommers highlighted the role of energy in Trump’s electoral success, asserting that the proposals would boost U.S. oil and gas production, which has increased under President Biden.

Environmental advocates criticized the proposal. Jason Rylander of the Center for Biological Diversity labeled it a “toxic” plan favoring the oil industry over environmental and community health. He pledged legal challenges if necessary.

Despite API’s stated support for the Paris Agreement’s goals, some proposals appear inconsistent with these aims. Sommers noted internal support for federal methane regulation but opposed the specific fee enacted by the Biden administration. He did not clarify what alternative fee would be acceptable.

ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods urged the new administration to uphold the Paris Agreement during comments at COP29, the UN climate meeting in Azerbaijan. This year, projected as the hottest on record, underscores scientists’ calls for reduced oil and gas production to meet climate targets.

Kathy Harris of the Natural Resources Defense Council defended vehicle efficiency standards, which she says save Americans significantly at the pump, opposing oil industry efforts to weaken them. Anne Rolfes of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade criticized the API agenda as outdated, emphasizing its disconnect from modern high-mileage and electric vehicle technologies.

The oil sector heavily supported Trump’s campaign financially and anticipates collaboration with his administration. However, potential conflicts exist, such as the industry’s potential opposition to new tariffs that could impede free oil and gas trade, a key Trump promise.

Many API-backed changes could be implemented administratively, but some, including repealing the methane fee, would require congressional approval. Environmental groups are preparing legal actions to challenge these initiatives, as they did during Trump’s previous tenure.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

COP29 Ends Amidst Criticism Over Loopholes and Disunity


The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) concluded with widespread criticism over perceived loopholes and a lack of unity among participating nations. Environmental experts and activists expressed concerns that the agreements reached may be insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis.



Despite initial optimism, the conference, held in Bonn, Germany, was marked by intense debates and disagreements. Key issues included carbon emission reduction targets and financial commitments to developing countries. Many attendees felt these discussions fell short of meaningful progress. Learn more about the UN’s climate change efforts here.



A significant point of contention was the establishment of clear guidelines for monitoring and reporting emissions. Critics argue that the absence of stringent measures allows countries to exploit loopholes, undermining global efforts to curb climate change. The lack of consensus on this issue highlights the challenges in achieving cohesive international action.



Some developing nations voiced frustration over inadequate financial support from wealthier countries, which they argue is essential for implementing sustainable practices and mitigating climate impacts. This financial gap remains a major obstacle, fueling discontent and hampering collaborative efforts. Explore the Green Climate Fund’s role in supporting climate action.



Meanwhile, environmental groups emphasized the need for immediate and robust action, warning that delays could have catastrophic implications. They called for greater transparency and accountability in future agreements, urging nations to prioritize the planet’s health over economic interests.



As COP29 ends, the international community faces the challenge of bridging divides and enhancing cooperation to effectively combat climate change. Stakeholders are now looking ahead to future conferences, hoping for more decisive action and unity.

November 22, 2024

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024