In a world grappling with climate change, pollution, and pandemics, the need for reliable scientific information has never been more critical. Yet, a deluge of anti-science propaganda is threatening to mislead public opinion and hinder informed decision-making. In response, the global scientific community is mobilizing to support American researchers facing unprecedented challenges.
A significant gathering of Earth science leaders from the U.S. and Europe took place at the European Geosciences Union (EGU25) annual conference in Vienna, Austria, attended by 18,000 scientists from over 130 countries. The “Great Debate” event addressed the impact of political changes, notably in the U.S., on scientific integrity and research. According to EGU president Peter van der Beek, the debate was prompted by “a disaster going on, in this case the suppression of science.”
Van der Beek emphasized that suppressing science is a global tragedy, particularly when it involves a nation known for its leadership in pioneering research. Efforts to counteract these challenges are underway, including community solidarity and potential financial incentives. French President Emanuel Macron announced a 500 million euro package to attract American scientists to Europe, as reported by France 24. “If you love freedom, come and do research here,” Macron stated.
The EGU conference featured over 800 American scientists presenting research on the effects of human-caused warming on the planet. Highlights included discussions on space pollution by NASA researchers and findings from the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration.
Meanwhile, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) is contesting the legality of staffing cuts in federal science programs through a lawsuit. They have also partnered with the American Meteorological Society to publish an independent national climate assessment, in light of the Trump administration’s dismissal of the scientists responsible for the report.
Support for U.S. Scientists
Helen Amanda Fricker, a geophysics professor at the University of California San Diego, highlighted the overwhelming stress faced by U.S. scientists. “It’s just coming at us from all sides,” she said, urging international colleagues to offer support. Fricker encouraged reaching out to American peers to check on their well-being amid the tumultuous political climate.
Christopher “Chuck” Bailey from the Geological Society of America noted the impact of government cuts on scientific gatherings, with U.S. Geological Survey scientists unable to attend a recent meeting due to travel restrictions. “All their travel cards were set back to a $1 limit, and that doesn’t take you very far,” he remarked.
Bailey’s concerns extend to the future of education and research institutions, as his daughter, a recent graduate accepted into a U.S. graduate program, hesitates to return from Spain to study science.
Political Engagement
Brandon Jones, president of the AGU, warned of the broader implications of political decisions on science and society. His organization is actively engaging in legal challenges against federal science agency cuts and promoting science advocacy at local levels. “We’re taking our message to elected representatives,” he stated, emphasizing the need for science-based decision-making.
To support climate research, the AGU and the American Meteorological Society are creating a special collection for climate science studies related to the national climate assessment. “We’re stepping in to ensure that science continues,” Jones affirmed, aiming to sustain and strengthen scientific endeavors in the face of political challenges.
Original Story at insideclimatenews.org