Decarbonizing the Baltic-Finnish Gas Market: A Necessity and an Opportunity

Transitioning existing natural gas infrastructure with renewable electricity and improved efficiency is key for a resilient energy future.
The Baltic-Finnish gas market can and must be decarbonised

Supported by renewable electricity production, transitioning existing natural gas infrastructure to accommodate new gases through retrofitting and repurposing is essential. Combined with increased electrification and improved energy efficiency, these steps form the backbone of a resilient future energy system.

Achieving seamless integration of the gas market requires strong political commitment and cooperation between Baltic states.

Lithuania’s partial integration with the Baltic-Finland zone illustrates the challenges of achieving a unified market. Addressing these integration gaps is essential for maximizing regional operational efficiency.

Adapt what you have

A successful energy transition also mandates comprehensive coordination between the gas and electricity sectors. This includes aligning renewable energy infrastructure expansion with gas infrastructure enhancements.

Adapting current facilities, like Latvia’s underground gas storage, to handle new gases and manage high-demand periods is necessary. A complete reassessment of gas network development plans ensures the feasibility of supplying gas to smaller, remote areas.

The investment required for gas sector decarbonization, though substantial, is justified by long-term environmental and economic benefits.

The study finds that the average production costs of biomethane, projected to be the dominant fuel in 2050, will be significantly lower than natural gas prices at €52.5/MWh versus €96/MWh.

The transition promises increased economic output, job creation, long-term energy cost reductions, and decreased reliance on imported fuels.

The costs of delay are enormous, not just in economic terms but in human lives and environmental degradation.

The year 2023, the hottest on record, brought unprecedented extreme temperatures and “once-in-a-century” storms, causing widespread drought, disease, and resource conflicts. These adversities hit the most vulnerable communities hardest, exacerbating existing inequalities and threatening livelihoods.

A transformative opportunity

The Baltic-Finland common gas market offers a transformative opportunity to reduce total gas demand and import needs, thereby mitigating regional geopolitical risks.

By advancing this transition, we not only address immediate environmental threats but also align with the EU’s broader environmental goals, setting a precedent for sustainable energy practices.

The time for action is now. We have a unique opportunity to secure a sustainable, equitable energy future for the Baltic-Finnish region and beyond. Delaying only compounds risks and costs, while swift measures promise a resilient, thriving future.

Policymakers must seize this moment to lead towards a cleaner, greener energy landscape.

Original Story at www.sei.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.