Creation Covenant Alliance

Biden Needs to Take Immediate Action to Secure His Environmental Legacy

Here are three actions President Biden can take before leaving office to cement his environmental legacy: combat...
President Joe Biden speaks at Prince William Forest Park on Earth Day, Monday, April 22, 2024, in Triangle, Va.

Three Areas for Presidential Action Before Leaving Office

President Joe Biden speaks at Prince William Forest Park on Earth Day, Monday, April 22, 2024, in Triangle, Va.

President Joe Biden speaks in Virginia on Earth Day 2024. | Photo by Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated since its original publication. 

The Biden-Harris administration is entering its final months with opportunities to strengthen its environmental legacy. As Congress reconvenes on November 12, the administration should collaborate with lawmakers to make significant advancements in climate policy.

Firstly, the administration must continue its historic efforts to combat the climate crisis by reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Landmark legislations like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law have been pivotal in addressing climate change, boosting American jobs, and positioning the US as a leader in the emerging economy. Continued investment in clean energy and manufacturing is vital, alongside halting policies that promote fossil fuel expansion.

Two immediate actions can help mitigate fossil fuel-driven climate change. One is halting the development of large-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals, such as the proposed CP2 facility in Louisiana. Expanding LNG infrastructure risks locking the US into an unsustainable fossil fuel future, with extraction and export posing public health threats and potentially increasing domestic energy costs by $14.3 billion annually, according to Public Citizen. The Biden administration should reject these expansions and the CP2 project.

Another crucial action is opposing the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024, proposed by Senators Joe Manchin and John Barrasso. This bill threatens to undermine environmental laws, endanger public health, and expedite LNG project reviews, moving in the wrong direction.

Secondly, the Biden-Harris administration should enhance its leadership in public land protection. The America the Beautiful initiative aims to conserve 30% of US lands and waters by 2030. The administration could make significant strides by using the Antiquities Act to establish new national monuments, building on its record of protecting over 12.5 million acres in 2023. Potential sites include the Sáttítla highlands in Northern California, the Chuckwalla National Monument in California’s desert, and the historical site of the Tulsa Race Massacre.

Lastly, the administration should work with Congress to expand outdoor access for all Americans by passing the EXPLORE Act. This bipartisan bill, featuring the Outdoors for All Act and expanding the Every Kid Outdoors program, aims to make national parks and public lands more accessible, helping close the nature equity gap.

President Biden deserves recognition for prioritizing climate action, pollution reduction, and land conservation. With 10 weeks remaining, there is an opportunity for bold action to further these initiatives.

More stories about:

federal climate policy,
climate change,
public lands

Original Story at www.sierraclub.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024