A Pipeline Passes Through It

Shelley Robbins navigates the controversial expansion of natural gas pipelines in North Carolina, raising local and environmental concerns amidst a backdrop of impending climate impacts.
Shelley Robbins, the senior decarbonization manager for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, stands next to the Dan River in Rockingham County. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News

Gaslighting: Third in a series about opposition to new natural gas pipelines, power plants, and storage facilities in North Carolina.

EDEN, N.C.—A man was spotted in a white unmarked truck near a natural gas pipeline at the Dan River. This scene mirrored one from the previous month.

Shelley Robbins, senior decarbonization manager for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, observed the area while walking towards Draper Landing, a public boat launch and tourist spot.

October saw the landscape transform, with leaves turning russet and saffron. Survey stakes marked “wetlands” were visible. The air was filled with the smell of decay, and vultures circled above.

This river was heavily polluted in February 2014 by toxic coal ash from Duke Energy’s Dan River Steam Plant. Over time, some of this material settled at the river’s bottom despite cleanup efforts.

Fossil fuels are again central to the river’s future. Robbins followed pipeline maps indicating a significant natural gas expansion in North Carolina.

Projects like pipelines and compressor stations are expected to emit methane, a significant greenhouse gas, and other pollutants. These raise concerns about safety and health impacts.

Transco’s pipeline already crosses the Dan River at Draper Landing, with plans to extend further in North Carolina.

The Mountain Valley Pipeline’s Southgate extension, along with the T15 Reliability Project, is planned in this area.

The T15, an existing 63-year-old pipeline, runs through Rockingham and Caswell counties. Due to its age, an upgrade is necessary, with new sections planned through Person County, where Duke Energy intends to build natural gas plants.

A new compressor station, Ruffin II, is planned due to the pipeline upgrade, highlighting the need for larger infrastructure to manage increased pressure.

Previously owned by Public Service Co. of North Carolina, the T15 is now under Canadian energy giant Enbridge following a $4 billion acquisition approved by the N.C. Utilities Commission.

The natural gas for these projects originates from fracking in Appalachia or Gulf Coast plants, destined for homes, businesses, and new Duke plants. Utilities could also resell gas, potentially exporting it.

The complexity and rapid development of these projects are daunting, akin to assembling a puzzle without a clear picture.

Expansion parts are fragmented, subject to varying regulations. The T15, operating solely within North Carolina, bypasses several federal oversight requirements.

“It’s disheartening,” Robbins remarked. “We’re locking in significant risks.”

Robbins’ journey along the pipeline route allowed her to escape conference rooms and presentations. During her trip, she noted Transco’s metering station, a system most locals might overlook.

She noticed the picturesque field and forest by the river but was acutely aware of the pipeline infrastructure.

Robbins documented her observations before leaving the area.

July’s Hearing on the Enbridge Sale

In July, about 20 people gathered for a hearing at the N.C. Utilities Commission in Raleigh. Half were there to testify against Dominion’s plan to sell its subsidiary to Enbridge.

Approval from the Utilities Commission was necessary for Enbridge to become North America’s largest natural gas utility. However, concerns were raised about Enbridge’s safety record.

Despite concerns, the commission approved the sale, transferring all Dominion’s North Carolina infrastructure to Enbridge.

The Ruffin Compressor Station

As Robbins traveled along the pipeline route, she observed several solar farms. She envisions a future powered by solar and battery storage, reducing reliance on polluting infrastructure.

Robbins emphasized the importance of offering alternatives to fossil fuels.

At the Ruffin compressor station, Robbins noted its small size and quiet presence, knowing the new larger station would significantly increase pollution emissions.

The new Ruffin II compressor station will emit more pollutants, posing health risks such as respiratory issues from high ozone levels and carcinogens like benzene and formaldehyde.

Robbins maintained her vigilance over environmental safety concerns, taking photographs for documentation.

At the End, the T15’s Eight-Mile Dogleg

The final segment of Robbins’ route took her through Caswell County, where the pipeline would cross state hunting and fishing lands and skirt the Dan River Work Farm.

In Person County, a new pipeline segment would supply Duke Energy’s proposed gas plants at Hyco Lake.

Robbins was shocked by the proximity of Duke’s plants to Woodland Elementary School, raising concerns about pollution exposure for students.

Emissions from the new gas-fired plants will continue to expose the community to pollutants, albeit at reduced levels compared to coal.

Robbins’ advocacy underscores the environmental and health implications of expanding fossil fuel infrastructure.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.