Potential Solar Project for Ada and Canyon County

Farmers, neighbors, and experts debated a 24-hundred-acre solar project in Ada County for nearly four hours.
Will a big solar project come to Ada and Canyon County?

ADA COUNTY, Idaho — The debate about a large solar farm proposed for Ada and Canyon County continued this week.

In May, over a hundred community members expressed their concerns to Ada County Commissioners.

On Wednesday, another public comment session took place, where seats were filled once again as people argued their cases regarding the 2,400-acre solar project.

Concerns About Farmland and Economy

Idaho already has several solar sites around the Treasure Valley. However, some residents are concerned about the new solar site taking over farmland.

Opponents of the Power Butte Energy Center’s solar project argue that the site would negatively impact the local economy.

Eric Casper, a farmer near Melba, said, “Once they build this, there won’t be the jobs that came off of that ground. It will choke our community, growth, and schools.”

Casper, who rented 500 acres of farmland for dairy cow feed, expressed concerns about the future, saying, “Preserve the farm ground like the Ada County comprehensive plan supports.”

Voices from Neighboring States

Rob Frank, an Oregon Commissioner-Elect for Harney County, worried about the precedent this project might set. “The whole Treasure Valley is some of the most fertile farmland in the western U.S.,” said Frank. “Taking such land out of production is worrisome as it may set a precedent across county and state lines.”

Frank noted that solar projects in Oregon did not bring the economic boost that farms offer.

Support for Renewable Energy

Despite the concerns, proponents of the solar project believe it will bring a valuable renewable resource to the area.

Brad Husinkveld, Idaho Conservation League Energy Policy Associate, stated, “Routinely, utilities select solar and storage projects as the least cost, least risk, most reliable, and safest option.”

Supporters also noted that the project would save 200 million gallons of water per day, which would be put back into the aquifer.

Mixed Opinions on Land Use

Shane Beus, who sold land to the solar company, mentioned the difficulty in selling the land, stating, “Some of it is very good farm ground, some of it is very marginal.”

Brian Merrell, another public hearing attendee, added, “There are large outcrops of lava rock that can’t be farmed. Some of our farm ground is good, and some is very bad.”

“This property is owned privately,” Beus remarked, “It’s interesting that all of a sudden, it’s Idaho’s farm ground, or my neighbor wants to claim it as his farm ground.”

Next Steps

The decision has been delayed until July 30th, allowing commissioners to review the comments from the hearing before making a decision. This hearing was specifically for the portion of the project in Ada County, while Canyon County’s planning and zoning commission will also have to vote.

Original Story at www.ktvb.com

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.