After recent Republican wins in Pennsylvania, a leading fracking and gas company is on track to expand its operations and increase profits. The election results are expected to streamline regulatory processes, favoring the energy sector, particularly natural gas extraction and pipeline expansion.



The GOP victories have bolstered the company’s confidence in achieving longstanding goals. Industry experts suggest that with reduced regulatory hurdles, the company can more efficiently pursue projects that were previously stalled. The company is a significant player in the Pennsylvania gas industry, known for its vast reserves of natural gas.



These political changes align with the firm’s ambitions to increase production and export capacity. The anticipated deregulation could lead to more pipeline construction, enhancing transportation infrastructure for natural gas. Analysts predict that the company’s revenue may increase significantly as a result of these developments.



Environmental groups, however, express concerns about the potential impact on local ecosystems. Critics argue that expanded fracking and pipeline projects could pose risks to water resources and contribute to environmental degradation. They urge state leaders to consider the ecological consequences before approving new projects.



Despite these concerns, the company remains optimistic, citing advancements in technology that could mitigate environmental risks. The firm’s executives emphasize their commitment to sustainable practices while pursuing economic growth and energy independence for the region.



As the political landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders in Pennsylvania’s energy sector watch closely to see how these developments will unfold, impacting both the industry and the environment.



Toby Rice of EQT Corp. champions U.S. natural gas exports, faces regulatory hurdles, and influences energy policy.
EQT CEO Toby Rice has become one of the most influential fossil fuel executives in America. Credit: Quinn Glabicki/PublicSource

This story was supported by the Pulitzer Center.

In late September, Toby Rice, president and CEO of EQT Corp., addressed fracking executives on the shores of Lake Erie. Rice, fresh from Climate Week in NYC, shared EQT’s vision for expanding fossil fuel operations in the Appalachian Basin, with a focus on increasing American gas exports.

“It’s never been more important to produce energy in this country,” said Rice, emphasizing challenges like difficult pipeline development and extensive permitting processes. He stressed the need for leaders who understand and support the energy industry.

Dave McCormick, then GOP nominee for U.S. Senate, followed Rice, advocating for America to become the global leader in energy production. He supported dismantling Biden-era drilling restrictions, enhancing fossil fuel infrastructure, and facilitating energy exports.

Since becoming EQT’s CEO in 2019, Rice has been a leading advocate for the Marcellus Shale gas industry, wielding considerable influence over U.S. energy policy. His “Shalennial” vision aligns with a potential shift towards fossil fuels under a Trump administration.

‘He wills things to happen’

Twenty years ago, Rice, a former All-American baseball player, was known for his bold character at Rollins College in Florida. Post-graduation, he worked on a Texas oil rig. In 2007, Rice, with family support, founded Rice Energy, a key player in the Marcellus Shale market.

Rice’s rise in the industry is considered remarkable. His leadership style is described as charismatic and hands-on, with a strong focus on technology and efficiency.

Rice Energy was sold to EQT for $6.7 billion in 2017, creating a major Appalachian gas firm. Rice later led a successful proxy battle to take control of EQT.

A fracking and lobbying force

Rice operates EQT from Carnegie, PA, where his office reflects a blend of modern and traditional energy industry ethos. As CEO, he has emphasized efficiency and innovation, acquiring Tug Hill for $5.2 billion to boost drilling capacity.

Rice champions U.S. liquified natural gas (LNG) exports, although some climate experts disagree with his claims of environmental benefits. He has been publicly active, rebutting allegations of price gouging with a focus on LNG’s potential.

EQT has entered significant LNG supply agreements, including contracts with facilities in Louisiana and Texas, bolstering its position in the global energy market. Despite federal challenges to LNG export permits, EQT continues lobbying efforts to promote LNG, supported by donations to political campaigns.

More pipelines, more exports

Rice views LNG as a global strategic asset, necessary for geopolitical stability and economic growth. However, experts like Clark Williams-Derry argue this approach has strained the industry financially.

Pipeline capacity remains a challenge. Rice has directed significant political contributions towards facilitating pipeline construction. The Mountain Valley Pipeline finally came online, aided by legislative efforts led by Sen. Joe Manchin.

Rice’s acquisitions, including Equitrans, position EQT as a vertically integrated firm, ready to expand globally. Under a Trump administration, a pro-LNG stance is anticipated, potentially increasing U.S. gas exports.

Increased LNG exports could raise domestic energy prices, impacting U.S. consumers. Organizations like the Industrial Energy Consumers of America have voiced concerns about unchecked export capacity leading to higher costs.

Community groups have expressed environmental and public health concerns related to LNG projects. Critics argue that exports serve international markets at the expense of domestic consumers.

Rice and EQT continue to advocate for LNG, investing in campaigns to promote its benefits despite concerns over its environmental impact and implications for U.S. energy prices.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News



After recent Republican wins in Pennsylvania, a leading fracking and gas company is on track to expand its operations and increase profits. The election results are expected to streamline regulatory processes, favoring the energy sector, particularly natural gas extraction and pipeline expansion.



The GOP victories have bolstered the company’s confidence in achieving longstanding goals. Industry experts suggest that with reduced regulatory hurdles, the company can more efficiently pursue projects that were previously stalled. The company is a significant player in the Pennsylvania gas industry, known for its vast reserves of natural gas.



These political changes align with the firm’s ambitions to increase production and export capacity. The anticipated deregulation could lead to more pipeline construction, enhancing transportation infrastructure for natural gas. Analysts predict that the company’s revenue may increase significantly as a result of these developments.



Environmental groups, however, express concerns about the potential impact on local ecosystems. Critics argue that expanded fracking and pipeline projects could pose risks to water resources and contribute to environmental degradation. They urge state leaders to consider the ecological consequences before approving new projects.



Despite these concerns, the company remains optimistic, citing advancements in technology that could mitigate environmental risks. The firm’s executives emphasize their commitment to sustainable practices while pursuing economic growth and energy independence for the region.



As the political landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders in Pennsylvania’s energy sector watch closely to see how these developments will unfold, impacting both the industry and the environment.



Rising Concerns Over Infrastructure and Indigenous Representation at COP30



The upcoming COP30 climate summit, set to take place in Belém, Brazil, is already facing scrutiny over its infrastructure readiness and the inclusion of Indigenous voices. With the event scheduled for 2025, preparations are underway, but several challenges remain unresolved.



Belém, the capital of Pará state, is seen as a symbolic location for the conference, given its proximity to the Amazon rainforest. However, concerns about the city’s infrastructure have been raised by various stakeholders. Local officials are under pressure to upgrade facilities, including transportation and accommodation, to handle the influx of international delegates and visitors.



In addition to logistical challenges, the representation of Indigenous communities in climate discussions is a significant issue. Indigenous groups, who are critical stewards of the Amazon, are advocating for a more prominent role in the negotiations. Historically, these communities have been sidelined in international climate forums, leading to calls for increased participation and decision-making power.



Efforts are underway to address these issues. The Brazilian government has pledged to improve infrastructure and ensure the summit’s success. Meanwhile, Indigenous leaders are actively seeking platforms to amplify their voices and influence policies that affect their lands and livelihoods.



Environmental organizations worldwide are closely monitoring developments, emphasizing the need for inclusive and effective climate action. The success of the COP30 summit hinges on addressing these critical concerns, ensuring that both logistical and representational challenges are met.



For more information on the role of Indigenous communities in environmental conservation, visit this United Nations article. To learn more about the previous COP summits, check out this overview of past conferences.

COP29 Ends Amidst Criticism Over Loopholes and Disunity


The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) concluded with widespread criticism over perceived loopholes and a lack of unity among participating nations. Environmental experts and activists expressed concerns that the agreements reached may be insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis.



Despite initial optimism, the conference, held in Bonn, Germany, was marked by intense debates and disagreements. Key issues included carbon emission reduction targets and financial commitments to developing countries. Many attendees felt these discussions fell short of meaningful progress. Learn more about the UN’s climate change efforts here.



A significant point of contention was the establishment of clear guidelines for monitoring and reporting emissions. Critics argue that the absence of stringent measures allows countries to exploit loopholes, undermining global efforts to curb climate change. The lack of consensus on this issue highlights the challenges in achieving cohesive international action.



Some developing nations voiced frustration over inadequate financial support from wealthier countries, which they argue is essential for implementing sustainable practices and mitigating climate impacts. This financial gap remains a major obstacle, fueling discontent and hampering collaborative efforts. Explore the Green Climate Fund’s role in supporting climate action.



Meanwhile, environmental groups emphasized the need for immediate and robust action, warning that delays could have catastrophic implications. They called for greater transparency and accountability in future agreements, urging nations to prioritize the planet’s health over economic interests.



As COP29 ends, the international community faces the challenge of bridging divides and enhancing cooperation to effectively combat climate change. Stakeholders are now looking ahead to future conferences, hoping for more decisive action and unity.