Updates from the Lufthansa Group

Lufthansa introduces an Environmental Cost Surcharge to cover rising regulatory costs, starting June 2024.
lufthansa city airlines, the youngest airline in the lufthansa group, will commence flight operations on june 26, 2024.

The Lufthansa Group has introduced an Environmental Cost Surcharge to address rising regulatory environmental costs. These costs include the statutory blending quota for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), adjustments to the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), and costs linked to the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).

Implementation Details

Starting June 26, 2024, the surcharge will apply to flights sold and operated by the Lufthansa Group departing from the EU, UK, Norway, and Switzerland. Charges, ranging from $1 to $78, will be levied on departures beginning January 1, 2025, and will be shown in the price details on Lufthansa Group Airlines booking pages.

Rationale Behind the Surcharge

Despite significant investments in sustainable technologies, Lufthansa acknowledges it can’t absorb all regulatory costs. The Environmental Cost Surcharge will cover part of these costs for 2025.

Climate Protection Targets

Lufthansa aims for a neutral CO2 balance by 2050 and to halve net CO2 emissions by 2030 compared to 2019. Key strategies include:

  • Net Carbon Emissions Reduction: Halving net emissions by 2030 and achieving neutrality by 2050.
  • Fleet Modernization: Over 250 new aircraft are expected to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by up to 30%.
  • SAF: Using SAF from biogenic residues and increasing SAF availability through partnerships.
  • Optimization of Flight Operations: Improving fuel efficiency and reducing emissions.
  • Innovative Technologies: Implementing technologies like AeroSHARK to reduce drag and fuel consumption.
  • Intermodality and CO2 Compensation: Promoting transport interlinking and offering CO2 offset options.

In 2023, Lufthansa’s CO2 emissions were approximately 88 grams per passenger kilometer, slightly down from the previous year.

Switzerland and the UK Systems

Since 2012, the EU ETS has regulated CO2 emissions for all flights within the European Economic Area (EEA). Lufthansa must also comply with Switzerland (CH-ETS) and the UK (UK-ETS) systems.

Switzerland runs the CH-ETS, which covers around 100 operators with about 5 million tonnes of CO2eq emissions annually. CH-ETS linked with the EU ETS in 2020, allowing participants to engage in European emissions trading. The UK launched the UK ETS after leaving the EU, and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Switzerland integrates flights between the two countries into their respective ETS frameworks.

Background Information

Under the EU’s “Fit for 55” program, SAF blending quotas will rise from 2% in 2025 to 70% by 2050, significantly increasing operational costs for the Lufthansa Group.

Established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in 2016, CORSIA requires airlines to purchase certificates to offset growth-related CO2 emissions in international aviation, covering emissions exceeding 85% of 2019 levels.

In 2022, the Lufthansa Group used approximately 13,000 tonnes of SAF, representing just under 0.2% of its total fuel demand and about 5% of global SAF availability. Lufthansa is involved in projects to boost SAF availability and develop next-generation SAF technologies, including Power-to-Liquid (PtL) and Sun-to-Liquid (StL) fuels.

Original Story at www.environmentenergyleader.com

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.