UK Energy Secretary to Announce Decision on Rampion 2 by February 2025

The UK Planning Inspectorate has submitted its report on the 1.2 GW Rampion 2 offshore wind farm to the Secretary.
UK Energy Secretary to Decide on Rampion 2 by Early February 2025

The UK Planning Inspectorate has submitted its recommendation report on Rampion 2, a proposed 1.2 GW expansion of the existing 400 MW Rampion offshore wind farm in Sussex, to the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero. The Secretary now has three months to make a decision.

The examination period closed in August after public consultation and review of RWE’s application for the development consent order (DCO). The Examining Authority (ExA) has forwarded its findings and recommendations to the Secretary of State.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is expected to make a decision on the 1.2 GW offshore wind farm by 6 February 2025.

If approved, construction of Rampion 2 could commence in late 2026 or early 2027, with full operation expected by the end of the decade.

RWE secured a seabed lease with The Crown Estate in 2021 and submitted the DCO application in August 2023. The Planning Inspectorate initiated the examination process on 7 September 2023.

Planned installations for Rampion 2 are located south and west of the current Rampion site, between 13 and 25 kilometers offshore.

The wind farm will feature 90 turbines and connect to the national electricity transmission network via underground cables from Climping, West Sussex, to the National Grid substation at Bolney in Mid-Sussex, passing through the new Rampion 2 substation at Oakendene.

The original plan had 116 turbines, but feedback on visual and shipping concerns led to a reduction to 90 turbines after consultations in 2021 and 2022.

RWE is developing the project for Rampion Extension Development Limited, a joint venture with a Macquarie-led consortium and an Enbridge subsidiary.

Original Story at www.offshorewind.biz

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.