Potential November Ballot Measure on Natural Gas in Washington

Supporters of Initiative 2066 submitted 431,000 signatures to keep natural gas service in WA, setting up a key ballot debate.
WA initiative on natural gas could be on your ballot in November


Climate Lab
is a Seattle Times initiative exploring climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest and beyond, funded by The Bullitt Foundation, Jim and Birte Falconer, Mike and Becky Hughes, University of Washington, and Walker Family Foundation.

TUMWATER — Supporters of a measure to maintain natural gas service in Washington claim they have enough signatures to get it on the November ballot.

Initiative 2066 aims to protect natural gas use and repeal parts of a recently passed law that pushes Puget Sound Energy to transition away from natural gas.

If successful, this could set up a significant ballot battle over environmental issues this fall. The natural gas measure would join Initiative 2117, which aims to repeal the state’s carbon emission reduction system.

Supporters submitted about 431,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s office in Tumwater, surpassing the required 324,500 valid signatures. Another batch will be submitted later this week.

Let’s Go Washington, backed by Redmond businessman Brian Heywood, is behind the initiative, supported by the Washington Hospitality Association and the Building Industry Association of Washington.

Restaurant owners, grocery stores, hotel operators, and builders argue that natural gas is crucial for operations and affordability.

“We’ve formed a partnership to push back against legislative overreach,” Heywood said.

2024 WA Election |
Local Politics

Dan Deva of Mayuri Foods in Redmond stated that converting his stores to all-electric would cost $700,000 to $800,000.

“I-2066 is simple,” said Greg Lane of the Building Industry Association of Washington. “It protects natural gas services and consumer energy choices.”

This year’s legislative session passed House Bill 1589 to help Puget Sound Energy comply with climate legislation. The bill does not ban natural gas, but initiative supporters want to ensure consumer choice.

Lane noted the higher costs associated with all-electric systems in new homes.

If passed, the initiative would repeal provisions assessing electrification potential and achieving cost-effective electrification for natural gas customers.

House Bill 1589 could potentially merge natural gas and electric customers into one rate plan, though Puget Sound Energy stated this change would take years. The initiative would repeal this provision.

The initiative also targets recently passed energy efficiency mandates.

State Sen. Joe Nguyen argued the initiative would raise rates for low-income and industrial methane gas users. He said the bill allows for thoughtful planning around electrification trends.

Climate Solutions called the initiative a “major misstep” and stressed the importance of existing laws to keep utility bills low.

Caitlin Krenn of Washington Conservation Action said the initiative was “misleading and destructive,” claiming it would remove communities’ choices and jeopardize efficiency programs.

Original Story at www.seattletimes.com

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.