Fairfield and Hamilton Expand Their Infrastructure with More Electric Vehicle Stations

Fairfield is expanding EV charging infrastructure with OKI Carbon Reduction Grants, installing new stations at no cost to the city.

Fairfield Set to Increase EV Charging Infrastructure

Fairfield is in the process of expanding its electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure at no cost to the city. The funding is provided by the Ohio Kentucky Indiana (OKI) Regional Council of Governments’ Carbon Reduction Grant program. They are also seeking additional funds for more stations from the same council.

EV Charging Station Installations

The installation of EV charging stations is part of a broader city planning initiative. Earlier this year, OKI granted Fairfield’s funding request for three Level 2 dual-port charging stations. These are scheduled to be installed in Waterworks Park, the Fairfield Lane Library, and Harbin Park this fall.

As part of the second round of OKI’s Carbon Reduction Grant program, Fairfield is aiming to secure funding for additional Level 2 charging stations. If successful, these will be installed at Waterworks Park, the Community Arts Center, and the Justice Center. The total cost, including contingency funding, is expected to be a little over $600,000, with no matching funds from Fairfield.

Existing EV Charging Options in Fairfield

The current EV charging options within Fairfield are limited, with stations at two local car dealerships, a hospital, and two supermarkets. More publicly and privately owned EV stations are available in neighboring West Chester and Liberty townships, and in Hamilton to the north.

At present, Fairfield has one Level 2 dual-port charging station at the Community Arts Center. This station is free to use and was chosen due to its safe location, proximity to a heavily traveled route, and the fact it was installed on city property at no local cost. Once the new stations are operational, a fee will be introduced according to city authorities.

Hamilton’s EV Charging Infrastructure

Neighboring Hamilton’s publicly owned EV charging stations are serviced by ChargePoint. The city purchased five Level 2 dual-port stations in 2021 using an Ohio EPA grant. Hamilton was also awarded a $441,000 grant through OKI last year to install six Level 3 EV fast chargers.

The planned charging station locations are in high-traffic areas and are expected to be used frequently. The Level 3 charging stations are currently in the procurement phase, with installation planned before the end of the year. Officials are also pursuing additional grant opportunities to further expand the city’s EV infrastructure.

Strategic EV Infrastructure Expansion

The push for more EV charging stations aligns with both Fairfield and Hamilton’s goals to prepare for the increase in electric vehicles. Fairfield City Council member Tim Meyer expressed approval of the swift action taken to expand the city’s charging infrastructure, which aligns with the city’s Fairfield Forward Comprehensive Plan and draft Fairfield Sustains plan.

Public Works Director Ben Mann emphasized that investigating electric vehicle charging stations is specifically mentioned in the plan. He expressed belief in the grant’s merit and the potential benefits the EV charging stations could bring to the local economy.

Original Story at www.journal-news.com

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.