Courts Must Dismiss SLAPP Suits Similar to the One Against Greenpeace

A lawsuit against the group is nothing more than corporate bullying. Energy Transfer’s suit against Greenpeace is a SLAPP tactic.
Greenpeace ship, the Rainbow Warrior

Aug 3 2024

Distributed by Trice Edney Newswire.

In 1996, Texas cattle ranchers sued Oprah Winfrey for over $12 million, claiming her show on mad cow disease hurt their business. Without an anti-SLAPP law, Winfrey fought the lawsuit in court for six weeks before winning.

SLAPP suits, or Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, aim to silence people on public interest issues. These lawsuits often misuse free speech protections to harass critics. Primarily used by wealthy entities, SLAPP suits divert targets’ resources into legal defenses. This tactic is increasingly employed by the fossil fuel industry to stifle environmental advocacy.

Currently, Energy Transfer, behind the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), is suing Greenpeace for over $300 million. The company alleges Greenpeace led protests against the pipeline, defaming Energy Transfer and causing financial losses.

The movement to stop the pipeline was initially led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, aiming to protect their water supply and sacred sites. Tribal leaders garnered support from numerous organizations and activists. Energy Transfer’s suit undermines the tribe’s authority and agency in organizing the anti-DAPL movement.

Greenpeace’s involvement in the protests was limited, with minimal on-ground organizers and social media support. According to Tefere Gebre, Greenpeace’s Chief Program Officer, this lawsuit could set a precedent for corporate America to stifle opposition by leveraging legal tactics.

The initial lawsuit was dismissed in federal court, but Energy Transfer refiled it in North Dakota, which lacks an anti-SLAPP statute. Currently, 34 states and the District of Columbia have anti-SLAPP laws. Greenpeace previously defended against a SLAPP suit in California, invoking the state’s anti-SLAPP law to dismiss claims.

Energy Transfer’s suit could transform SLAPPs into tools for eliminating opposition. The rights of tribes, workers, and consumers are at risk. This case aims to suppress grassroots movements before they gain traction.

Grassroots organizations must unite against such tactics. Congress should pass a federal anti-SLAPP law to standardize the definition of SLAPP suits nationwide. Representative Jamie Raskin introduced such a bill in the last Congress.

Raising awareness is crucial. Gebre emphasizes, “If corporations can buy their own law, it’s like buying their own elected officials. We must speak up and stop this from happening. We need solidarity, not sympathy.”

Original Story at www.sierraclub.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.