China’s Ambitious Nuclear Power Surge
China is rapidly positioning itself as a global leader in nuclear energy, constructing nearly as many reactors as the rest of the world combined. While its dominance in solar panels and electric vehicles is widely recognized, China’s swift expansion in nuclear technology is poised to outpace the United States by 2030, marking a significant shift in global energy dynamics.
China has effectively navigated challenges that have hindered Western nuclear projects, drawing from American and French reactor designs to avoid the construction delays and cost overruns prevalent in the West.
Simultaneously, China is forging ahead with next-generation nuclear technologies and investing heavily in fusion, a potential game-changer for clean energy. The country’s ultimate goal is to become a leading exporter of nuclear technology, joining an exclusive club of nations capable of designing and exporting advanced reactors.
Visual China Group, via Getty Images
“The Chinese are moving very, very fast,” said Mark Hibbs, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace who has written a book on China’s nuclear program. “They are very keen to show the world that their program is unstoppable.”
As the U.S. and China vie for global energy dominance, nuclear power has become a critical focal point, given its potential to provide stable, emission-free electricity. The U.S., under recent administrations, has focused on fossil fuels, while China has concentrated on renewable technologies. Nuclear power is seeing renewed interest globally due to its ability to generate electricity without carbon emissions, unlike coal and gas plants.
Construction costs of nuclear reactors
Note: Reactors are placed according to the date they entered or are expected to enter commercial operation. Chart shows inflation-adjusted overnight costs, which exclude interest payments. Trend lines show linear regression slope.
Source: Liu et al. 2025
China’s reactors are being built at a pace and cost that far outstrips Western efforts. In the U.S., nuclear construction costs have soared, while they have halved in China since the 2000s. The rapid assembly of reactors, completed in five to six years, reflects a stark efficiency advantage.
“When we first got this data and saw that declining trend in China, it surprised me,” said Shangwei Liu, a research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government who led the paper.
How China Mastered Nuclear Power
Constructing a modern nuclear power plant is a highly complex endeavor, involving specialized materials and rigorous safety standards. China has mastered this process with substantial government support, including favorable financing and a streamlined construction strategy focused on replicating a few reactor designs efficiently.
This strategic focus allows Chinese companies to refine their methodologies, supported by a national mandate to expand nuclear capabilities. This contrasts sharply with the West, where regulatory hurdles and design experimentation have introduced significant unpredictability.
Shi Jun/Visual China Group, via Getty Images
China’s experience with the AP1000 reactor model illustrates its ability to learn and adapt. After initial challenges, China refined the design and supply chain, leading to cost-effective construction of subsequent reactors.
“What the Chinese did was really smart,” said James Krellenstein, the chief executive of Alva Energy, a nuclear consultancy. “They said, we’re going to pause for a few years and incorporate every lesson learned.”
China’s safety regulations are comparable to those in the West, but the approval process is more predictable, with fewer avenues for opposition. This efficiency in project execution is bolstered by China’s expertise in managing large-scale infrastructure projects.
As China seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, nuclear power is set to play an integral role alongside renewables, potentially displacing coal as a primary energy source.
Can the U.S. Catch Up?
In the U.S., bipartisan support exists for nuclear power expansion, yet the approach leans heavily on private sector innovation rather than direct government intervention. Start-ups are developing smaller, more affordable reactors, with substantial investment from tech giants aiming to power data centers.
The Trump administration has pushed for regulatory reforms to expedite nuclear project approvals, hoping to leverage private capital and innovation to compete with China’s state-backed advancements.
Thomas Kronsteiner/Getty Images
Energy Secretary Chris Wright expressed confidence in America’s innovative edge, stating that competitive capitalism could propel the U.S. ahead of China in nuclear technology.
However, some experts caution that relying too heavily on technological breakthroughs without addressing foundational industry needs could leave the U.S. trailing. The loss of domestic manufacturing capabilities for large reactor components is a particular concern.
“You look at the number of designs, particularly in the U.S., you think, Oh, God, help us,” said Philip Andrews-Speed, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. “I would think narrowing down is the sensible thing to do.”
A Race to Power the World
Liu Xuan/Visual China Group, via Getty Images
China’s nuclear ambitions extend beyond its borders, with plans to dominate the global market. Chinese firms are actively exporting reactors, with successful projects already completed in countries like Pakistan.
China’s pursuit of advanced nuclear technologies, such as thorium reactors and fuel recycling, aims to mitigate resource constraints and establish a competitive edge in next-generation reactors.
Despite U.S. leadership in nuclear innovation, a recent report warned that China is significantly ahead in deploying these technologies at scale.
“Maybe we can convince some of our allies not to buy Chinese reactors, but there are going to be plenty of other countries out there with growing energy demands,” said Paul Saunders, president of the Center for National Interest. “And if America isn’t ready, we won’t be able to compete.”
Original Story at www.nytimes.com