Averting a Return to 1930s Protectionism

Global trade “is not having the best of times,” says WTO's Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, citing rising protectionism and fragmentation.
'We hope we don't see a return to 1930s protectionism'

Global trade “is not having the best of times at the moment,” according to Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, director-general of the World Trade Organization (WTO). “We are seeing increasing protectionism, some undermining of the WTO rules, and this is leading to fragmentation,” she told the BBC.

Dr. Okonjo-Iweala emphasized that global trade is crucial for making countries resilient and supporting growth. Recent weeks have seen significant trade tensions, with the EU imposing provisional tariffs of up to 37.4% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). This follows the US’s introduction of 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs in May.

Brussels and Washington accuse the Chinese government of unfairly subsidizing its EV sector, allowing producers to export cars at low prices, threatening Western jobs. President Biden has also increased import taxes on other Chinese products, including EV batteries, solar panel cells, and computer chips.

The US has also invested heavily in green technology through its Inflation Reduction Act, aiming to reduce reliance on Chinese imports.

EU’s Response to Trade Imbalances

EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis stated that Europe does not want to close its market for EVs but insists on fair competition. Last year, global trade volume fell for the third time in 30 years, attributed to higher inflation and interest rates. The WTO forecasts a recovery this year.

IMF’s first deputy managing director Gita Gopinath noted that recent events like the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have fundamentally reshaped global trade. Countries are increasingly guided by economic and national security concerns in their trade decisions.

Dr. Okonjo-Iweala warns that the emerging fragmentation in trade data, where trade between like-minded blocks grows faster than across such blocks, could be costly. WTO research estimates this could price at 5% of the global economy, while the IMF suggests it could be nearer 7% or $7.4 trillion (£5.8 trillion) of lost output in the long run.

Impact on Trade Relations

The EU’s tariffs on Chinese EVs follow a surge in their exports to Europe, jumping from $1.6 billion in 2020 to $11.5 billion last year, according to one study. Chinese companies like BYD, Geely, and SAIC have benefited from significant government support.

Jens Eskelund, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, argues that Chinese EV companies no longer need this help and that tariffs indicate an imbalance. He notes that the volume of EU goods sold to China has fallen by about a third since 2017, despite China’s steady economic growth.

Eskelund cites Chinese market restrictions and tough security regulations as reasons for this imbalance, adding that Europe remains a more open market to Chinese firms than vice versa.

Efforts to Reduce Dependence on China

The EU aims to lower its economic dependence on China, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen advocating for “de-risk not de-couple.” Concerns include China’s use of sensitive technology for military purposes and its support for Russia.

Companies like Ikea, Nike, and Apple are also seeking to reduce reliance on China. While talks between the EU and China on EV tariffs are set to continue, Chinese state media reports suggest retaliatory measures on EU goods are being considered.

Other Trade Barriers

Global trade faces additional barriers, including challenges in two key trade routes. The Panama Canal has reduced ship transit due to a lack of rainfall, while the Suez Canal is impacted by ongoing attacks on commercial ships by Houthi rebels in the Red Sea. This disruption has raised shipping rates by 30-40%, according to Hapag-Lloyd CEO Rolf Habben Jansen.

Despite rising shipping costs, which could drive inflation, Dr. Okonjo-Iweala remains optimistic about trade resilience. She acknowledges the need for WTO rule changes to address climate change challenges, warning against a repeat of the retaliatory tariffs seen in the 1930s.

Original Story at www.bbc.com

Trending News

Federal Funding Targets Reduction of Carbon Emissions and Air Pollution at US Ports


The U.S. government has announced a new initiative to tackle carbon emissions and air pollution at the nation’s ports. This effort comes with the allocation of federal funds aimed at modernizing port infrastructure and promoting sustainable practices. The goal is to significantly reduce the environmental impact of port operations, a critical step in addressing climate change.



Significant Investments in Green Technologies


The initiative involves substantial investments in green technologies, including electrified equipment and renewable energy sources. Ports are major contributors to air pollution, primarily due to emissions from diesel-powered vehicles and equipment. By adopting cleaner technologies, the U.S. aims to cut down on the release of harmful pollutants.



Government and Industry Collaboration


The program calls for collaboration between federal agencies and industry stakeholders. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides guidelines for reducing emissions, offering ports technical assistance to implement sustainable practices. This partnership is crucial for developing innovative solutions tailored to specific port needs.



Impact on Local Communities


Local communities, often disproportionately affected by air pollution from ports, are expected to benefit from cleaner air and improved health outcomes. The initiative emphasizes the importance of involving community organizations to ensure that the changes address local concerns.



Monitoring and Accountability


To ensure accountability, the program includes measures for monitoring emissions reductions and evaluating the effectiveness of implemented technologies. This data-driven approach facilitates continuous improvement and demonstrates the benefits of federal investments in environmental sustainability.



Long-Term Environmental Goals


This federal funding aligns with broader environmental goals, including achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. The U.S. government continues to prioritize policy changes that support these objectives and drive progress within the transportation and logistics sectors.