Encouraging Compact Living Across Europe

Future EU housing policy must provide adequate housing while reducing resource use. Smaller apartments in attractive areas can help.
Promoting compact living in Europe

Future European Union housing policy must address the dual challenges of providing adequate housing for all while drastically reducing resource use. Voluntary reductions in living space could significantly contribute to these goals.

The EU should promote the construction of smaller apartments in attractive neighborhoods and enable more flexible use of existing housing stock, according to a study published in Buildings & Cities by the Research Institute for Sustainability—Helmholtz Center Potsdam (RIFS).

“Construction and energy use in housing are major contributors to climate change. Reducing per capita living space would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from heating,” explains RIFS Director Doris Fuchs, co-author of the study.

The study examined the acceptance, motivation, and anticipated effects of voluntary reduction in living space in five EU countries: Germany, Latvia, Sweden, Spain, and Hungary. This research was part of the EU 1.5° Lifestyles consortium, coordinated by RIFS.

Few Citizens Willing to Voluntarily Downsize Living Space

In Europe, the average per capita living space increased by 16% between 2000 and 2018. However, there are significant differences between countries: Latvia’s average per capita living space is 29.6 square meters, while Sweden’s is 48.7 square meters.

Respondents in all countries expressed concerns about downsizing their living space, particularly regarding the loss of personal freedom and privacy, and described housing markets as challenging. Property owners often view their homes as long-term investments reflecting social status, says first author Matthias Lehner (Lund University).

In Spain, 42% of workshop participants were willing to reduce their living space, while in Hungary, only 15% were inclined to downsize. Communal living arrangements were even less popular across all countries studied, with Hungarian participants citing negative experiences during the Soviet era.

Enabling Environments Could Encourage Compact Living

Despite the challenges, European citizens might embrace smaller living spaces under the right conditions. Many participants preferred centrally-located apartments in green, friendly, and safe neighborhoods with access to services and leisure facilities, coupled with communal amenities and public spaces to enhance their quality of life, Fuchs explains.

If the EU aims to promote reduced per capita living space, it should encourage the construction of smaller apartments in high-quality neighborhoods. Measures to use existing housing stock more efficiently could include dividing or merging apartments for different household sizes, promoting shared apartments, and improving sustainability through renovations.

Appropriate legislation and economic incentives for construction and planning are necessary. The study also emphasizes the importance of “soft values” in building a good community, recommending that politicians support initiatives fostering social cohesion and inclusion.

Original Story at phys.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.