Creation Covenant Alliance

Virginia Misses Out as Green Energy Opportunities Favor Neighboring States

Virginia is lagging behind its neighbors in clean energy, missing out on growth and jobs. More efforts are needed to attract projects and combat climate change.
Green energy opportunities are going to our neighbors, passing Virginia by – The Virginian-Pilot

Virginia is lagging behind its neighbors in the fast-growing field of clean energy, according to a report by Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2), a national nonprofit group of investors and business leaders. The group analyzed how states are capitalizing on financial incentives provided by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.

E2’s research indicates that Virginia consistently trails its Southeast neighbors in clean energy manufacturing and jobs. The Energy News Network reported in May that, based on E2’s data, companies have announced at least 305 major clean energy projects across 40 states and Puerto Rico through April. This has generated more than 105,400 jobs and over $123 billion in capital investment.

Comparative Growth in the Southeast

In the Southeast, Georgia leads with 27 new projects, followed by South Carolina with 24, and North Carolina with 19. In contrast, Virginia is connected to only four of the nationwide new projects. This is concerning, especially considering recent developments that had raised hopes for Hampton Roads as an East Coast hub of offshore wind energy.

Setbacks and Missed Opportunities

Dominion Energy is proceeding with its extensive wind energy project off Virginia Beach’s coast, but there have been setbacks. For example, Siemens Gamesa canceled plans to build a $200 million turbine blade finishing plant at Portsmouth Marine Terminal, resulting in the loss of 310 anticipated jobs and a setback for the region’s clean energy economy.

Zach Ammitay, Southeast advocate for E2, pointed out that while neighboring states are using incentives to attract clean energy businesses, Virginia seems to be driving them away. He cited Governor Glenn Youngkin’s rejection of Ford Motor Co.’s proposal to build an electric vehicle battery plant in Pittsylvania County as a significant example. Youngkin opposed the deal due to Ford’s partnership with a Chinese company, but Ammitay argued that concerns about Chinese influence could have been addressed more productively. As a result, the battery plant is now being built in Michigan, sending a message that Virginia isn’t welcoming to innovative energy projects.

Current Projects and Future Potential

One of the four projects Virginia has landed is in Hampton Roads, where the Dutch company Fugro is expanding production of equipment for offshore wind projects. Attracting more such projects will boost Virginia’s economy and help combat climate change, which is particularly urgent in Hampton Roads due to rising sea levels and flooding.

Challenges from Dominion Energy

Another impediment to clean energy development in Virginia is Dominion Energy, the state’s largest utility. Dominion is making it more expensive for medium-sized solar projects to connect to the grid, with fees increasing by 20-40%. This is causing plans for solar power at schools, government buildings, community centers, churches, and businesses to be scaled back or canceled. Dominion claims that the upgrades ensure safety and reliability, but critics note that other states with lower costs have not experienced such issues.

The State Corporation Commission is evaluating these requirements. Regulators should aim to make it easier for businesses and institutions to switch to clean energy while considering safety concerns.

Replacing outdated power sources with clean energy is a rapidly growing sector. Making Virginia more welcoming to such ventures can help the state gain a larger share of this promising industry and address the urgent climate threats faced by its coastal communities.

Original Story at www.pilotonline.com

Trending News

COP29 Ends Amidst Criticism Over Loopholes and Disunity


The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) concluded with widespread criticism over perceived loopholes and a lack of unity among participating nations. Environmental experts and activists expressed concerns that the agreements reached may be insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis.



Despite initial optimism, the conference, held in Bonn, Germany, was marked by intense debates and disagreements. Key issues included carbon emission reduction targets and financial commitments to developing countries. Many attendees felt these discussions fell short of meaningful progress. Learn more about the UN’s climate change efforts here.



A significant point of contention was the establishment of clear guidelines for monitoring and reporting emissions. Critics argue that the absence of stringent measures allows countries to exploit loopholes, undermining global efforts to curb climate change. The lack of consensus on this issue highlights the challenges in achieving cohesive international action.



Some developing nations voiced frustration over inadequate financial support from wealthier countries, which they argue is essential for implementing sustainable practices and mitigating climate impacts. This financial gap remains a major obstacle, fueling discontent and hampering collaborative efforts. Explore the Green Climate Fund’s role in supporting climate action.



Meanwhile, environmental groups emphasized the need for immediate and robust action, warning that delays could have catastrophic implications. They called for greater transparency and accountability in future agreements, urging nations to prioritize the planet’s health over economic interests.



As COP29 ends, the international community faces the challenge of bridging divides and enhancing cooperation to effectively combat climate change. Stakeholders are now looking ahead to future conferences, hoping for more decisive action and unity.

November 22, 2024

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024