National Parks Create 400K+ Jobs, Contribute Billions to Economy

A new report from the National Park Service (NPS) highlights the remarkable economic contributions of U.S. national parks in 2023.

A new report from the National Park Service (NPS) highlights the remarkable economic contributions of U.S. national parks in 2023. Visitor spending in communities near parks reached a record-breaking $55.6 billion, supporting 415,400 jobs and providing $19.4 billion in labor income.

Local Economic Boosts Across the Nation

With 325.5 million visitors in 2023, national parks significantly impacted local economies in every state. For example, South Dakota’s Badlands National Park attracted over a million visitors who spent $134.6 million in nearby communities, sustaining 1,916 local jobs.

Sectors Reaping the Benefits

The report found that spending on lodging had the greatest economic impact, contributing $9.9 billion in output and supporting 89,200 jobs. Restaurants followed, generating $5.2 billion in economic output and supporting 68,600 jobs.

Federal Investments and Public Lands

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland emphasized the Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to restore and enhance national parks, highlighting their role in combating climate change and improving visitor experiences. “This report demonstrates the tremendous value of preserving these lands for both environmental and economic purposes,” she stated.

National Park Service Director Chuck Sams added, “Our parks not only tell important stories but also fuel positive economic impacts across communities nationwide.”

Accessing the Data

The findings are part of the 2023 National Park Visitor Spending Effects report, informed by enhanced socioeconomic data for accuracy. Interactive tools online allow users to explore trends and economic impacts by state, sector, and park.

For more details, visit the NPS website at www.nps.gov.

Trending News



After recent Republican wins in Pennsylvania, a leading fracking and gas company is on track to expand its operations and increase profits. The election results are expected to streamline regulatory processes, favoring the energy sector, particularly natural gas extraction and pipeline expansion.



The GOP victories have bolstered the company’s confidence in achieving longstanding goals. Industry experts suggest that with reduced regulatory hurdles, the company can more efficiently pursue projects that were previously stalled. The company is a significant player in the Pennsylvania gas industry, known for its vast reserves of natural gas.



These political changes align with the firm’s ambitions to increase production and export capacity. The anticipated deregulation could lead to more pipeline construction, enhancing transportation infrastructure for natural gas. Analysts predict that the company’s revenue may increase significantly as a result of these developments.



Environmental groups, however, express concerns about the potential impact on local ecosystems. Critics argue that expanded fracking and pipeline projects could pose risks to water resources and contribute to environmental degradation. They urge state leaders to consider the ecological consequences before approving new projects.



Despite these concerns, the company remains optimistic, citing advancements in technology that could mitigate environmental risks. The firm’s executives emphasize their commitment to sustainable practices while pursuing economic growth and energy independence for the region.



As the political landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders in Pennsylvania’s energy sector watch closely to see how these developments will unfold, impacting both the industry and the environment.



Rising Concerns Over Infrastructure and Indigenous Representation at COP30



The upcoming COP30 climate summit, set to take place in Belém, Brazil, is already facing scrutiny over its infrastructure readiness and the inclusion of Indigenous voices. With the event scheduled for 2025, preparations are underway, but several challenges remain unresolved.



Belém, the capital of Pará state, is seen as a symbolic location for the conference, given its proximity to the Amazon rainforest. However, concerns about the city’s infrastructure have been raised by various stakeholders. Local officials are under pressure to upgrade facilities, including transportation and accommodation, to handle the influx of international delegates and visitors.



In addition to logistical challenges, the representation of Indigenous communities in climate discussions is a significant issue. Indigenous groups, who are critical stewards of the Amazon, are advocating for a more prominent role in the negotiations. Historically, these communities have been sidelined in international climate forums, leading to calls for increased participation and decision-making power.



Efforts are underway to address these issues. The Brazilian government has pledged to improve infrastructure and ensure the summit’s success. Meanwhile, Indigenous leaders are actively seeking platforms to amplify their voices and influence policies that affect their lands and livelihoods.



Environmental organizations worldwide are closely monitoring developments, emphasizing the need for inclusive and effective climate action. The success of the COP30 summit hinges on addressing these critical concerns, ensuring that both logistical and representational challenges are met.



For more information on the role of Indigenous communities in environmental conservation, visit this United Nations article. To learn more about the previous COP summits, check out this overview of past conferences.

COP29 Ends Amidst Criticism Over Loopholes and Disunity


The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) concluded with widespread criticism over perceived loopholes and a lack of unity among participating nations. Environmental experts and activists expressed concerns that the agreements reached may be insufficient to address the escalating climate crisis.



Despite initial optimism, the conference, held in Bonn, Germany, was marked by intense debates and disagreements. Key issues included carbon emission reduction targets and financial commitments to developing countries. Many attendees felt these discussions fell short of meaningful progress. Learn more about the UN’s climate change efforts here.



A significant point of contention was the establishment of clear guidelines for monitoring and reporting emissions. Critics argue that the absence of stringent measures allows countries to exploit loopholes, undermining global efforts to curb climate change. The lack of consensus on this issue highlights the challenges in achieving cohesive international action.



Some developing nations voiced frustration over inadequate financial support from wealthier countries, which they argue is essential for implementing sustainable practices and mitigating climate impacts. This financial gap remains a major obstacle, fueling discontent and hampering collaborative efforts. Explore the Green Climate Fund’s role in supporting climate action.



Meanwhile, environmental groups emphasized the need for immediate and robust action, warning that delays could have catastrophic implications. They called for greater transparency and accountability in future agreements, urging nations to prioritize the planet’s health over economic interests.



As COP29 ends, the international community faces the challenge of bridging divides and enhancing cooperation to effectively combat climate change. Stakeholders are now looking ahead to future conferences, hoping for more decisive action and unity.