Bad River: A Tribal Fight Against Pipeline Expansion Emphasizes Long-Term Environmental Planning


A recent legal battle between the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and a major energy corporation has highlighted the importance of long-term environmental planning. The tribe is challenging the expansion of an aging oil pipeline that runs through their territory in northern Wisconsin, citing potential risks to their land and water resources.



As environmental concerns grow, the tribe is using this case as an opportunity to advocate for sustainable practices and protection of natural resources. The pipeline, operated by a Canadian company, has been a point of contention for years due to concerns about leaks and spills that could damage the tribe’s ancestral lands.



The Bad River Band’s resistance is part of a broader movement among Indigenous communities who are increasingly standing up against large-scale industrial projects threatening their environment and way of life. This case echoes similar disputes across North America where Indigenous rights and environmental protection intersect.



Despite the company’s assurances of safety measures and economic benefits, the Bad River Band remains firm in their opposition. They argue that the risks posed by the aging infrastructure outweigh any proposed benefits. The tribe’s long-term vision focuses on preserving their land for future generations, aligning with broader global initiatives to prioritize sustainability.



This ongoing legal confrontation underscores how Indigenous communities are crucial voices in conversations about environmental policy and infrastructure development. For more information on Indigenous environmental advocacy, visit Sierra Club and Greenpeace.



The case serves as a reminder of the complex challenges involved in balancing economic development with environmental conservation. It highlights how the power of collective action and long-term thinking can shape the future of environmental policy.

A Native American tribe in Wisconsin battles to remove an aging oil pipeline from their land, protecting sacred wetlands.
Mary Mazzio (left) and Joe Grosso filming on location at the Bad River Reservation. Credit: Richard Schultz/Courtesy of 50 Eggs Films

A small Native American reservation in northern Wisconsin hosts the “Everglades of the North,” a vast wetland on Lake Superior’s shores, one of the world’s largest freshwater lakes. The Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians has long worked to protect their homeland and wild rice beds vital to their culture and food supply, predating the reservation’s 1854 establishment.

“Bad River” focuses on the tribe’s recent legal battle to remove an aging crude oil pipeline from their reservation. The documentary, awarded Best Documentary at the Environmental Media Association Awards in Los Angeles, premieres on Peacock on Nov. 1.

Easements for the 71-year-old Enbridge pipeline on tribal land expired in 2013. The Canadian company has been trespassing on tribal land, with erosion along the route posing a “real and unreasonable risk” of rupture, as per a federal court ruling in 2023.

Enbridge has downplayed spill concerns, stating safety “is the very foundation of our business.” The company seeks state and federal approval to reroute the line around the reservation.

Inside Climate News spoke with Mary Mazzio, the film’s producer, writer, and director, to learn more about the film, the tribe, and the lessons from the Bad River Band’s environmental protection efforts. The interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

MARY MAZZIO: I met Mike Wiggins, the former chairman, who discussed the tribe’s battle against a Canadian pipeline operator over a pipeline at imminent risk of rupture, with expired easements. This journey began with “canoe diplomacy,” an experience that taught me about the tribe’s resilience and fortitude.

What started as a pipeline movie evolved into a historical examination of the Bad River people’s fight for sovereignty. Their prolonged struggle for environmental protection highlights their importance in safeguarding resources like Lake Superior.

At an event, Mike Wiggins emphasized it’s their patriotic duty to protect resources needed by all Americans amid increasing extreme weather. This community shoulders the burden for the nation.

The pipeline issue led the Bad River Band to file a federal lawsuit against the Canadian operator for expired rights. The court ruled in their favor, mandating the operator’s exit by 2026. However, the pipeline operator has appealed, waiting for a decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.

The proposed reroute would place the pipeline in a worse location within the Bad River watershed, including 139 blasting sites over water. Despite offers of up to $80 million to settle, the Band remains steadfast in their long-term values.

On the health implications, concerns arise over violence against Native women during construction and environmental impacts from potential spills. The community relies on their ecosystem for a healthful diet amid threats from industrial activity.

Ultimately, the Bad River Band’s story underscores the need for collective environmental responsibility, inspiring others to protect vital resources like Lake Superior.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

Bad River: A Tribal Fight Against Pipeline Expansion Emphasizes Long-Term Environmental Planning


A recent legal battle between the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and a major energy corporation has highlighted the importance of long-term environmental planning. The tribe is challenging the expansion of an aging oil pipeline that runs through their territory in northern Wisconsin, citing potential risks to their land and water resources.



As environmental concerns grow, the tribe is using this case as an opportunity to advocate for sustainable practices and protection of natural resources. The pipeline, operated by a Canadian company, has been a point of contention for years due to concerns about leaks and spills that could damage the tribe’s ancestral lands.



The Bad River Band’s resistance is part of a broader movement among Indigenous communities who are increasingly standing up against large-scale industrial projects threatening their environment and way of life. This case echoes similar disputes across North America where Indigenous rights and environmental protection intersect.



Despite the company’s assurances of safety measures and economic benefits, the Bad River Band remains firm in their opposition. They argue that the risks posed by the aging infrastructure outweigh any proposed benefits. The tribe’s long-term vision focuses on preserving their land for future generations, aligning with broader global initiatives to prioritize sustainability.



This ongoing legal confrontation underscores how Indigenous communities are crucial voices in conversations about environmental policy and infrastructure development. For more information on Indigenous environmental advocacy, visit Sierra Club and Greenpeace.



The case serves as a reminder of the complex challenges involved in balancing economic development with environmental conservation. It highlights how the power of collective action and long-term thinking can shape the future of environmental policy.