BlueFloat Cancels Offshore Wind Projects in New Zealand

BlueFloat Energy halts New Zealand offshore wind projects due to market uncertainties, focusing on advanced projects.
Waikato offshore wind project

BlueFloat Energy has halted the development of offshore wind projects in New Zealand as part of a global strategic review.

Despite this decision, BlueFloat Energy expressed confidence in the potential of offshore wind to support New Zealand’s decarbonization and economic growth goals.

The halt is attributed to uncertainties surrounding the development of the offshore wind market in New Zealand, including market routes and seabed allocation, according to the company.

“We urge the New Zealand Government to establish a supportive regulatory framework for offshore wind and help the industry navigate these uncertainties,” stated BlueFloat Energy.

The company will now concentrate on more advanced projects within its portfolio.

BlueFloat unveiled its offshore wind initiatives in New Zealand in 2021 through a partnership with Energy Estate and Elemental Group to develop up to 5 GW of offshore wind capacity across four projects.

In November 2022, the consortium announced its inaugural project in South Taranaki, featuring bottom-fixed technology and a 900 MW capacity. Another project in South Auckland and West Waikato followed later that month.

In 2023, BlueFloat partnered with Taranaki Offshore Partnership (TOP), comprising NZ Super Fund and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP), and Port Taranaki to study how the port’s assets can support offshore wind industry growth in Aotearoa.

According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), New Zealand possesses a technical offshore wind potential of 2,252 GW, with 148 GW suitable for fixed-bottom turbines and 2,104 GW for floating wind.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Original Story at www.offshorewind.biz

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.