Creation Covenant Alliance

Alabama Mine Expansion Challenges Biden’s Stance on Public Coal Extraction



The proposed expansion of a coal mine in Alabama is poised to test the Biden administration’s policy on private companies extracting coal from public lands. The Shepherd Bend Mine seeks to extend its operations, raising environmental concerns among activists and local communities. This development comes amid an ongoing national debate over the role of fossil fuels in America’s energy landscape.



Environmental groups argue that the expansion threatens nearby waterways and the surrounding ecosystem. They emphasize that coal mining can result in significant pollution, adversely affecting drinking water quality and local wildlife. The mine is located near the Black Warrior River, a critical water source for Birmingham and other communities.



Supporters of the expansion argue that it will bring much-needed economic benefits, including job creation and increased revenue for the region. They assert that modern mining techniques can minimize environmental impacts, enabling a balance between economic growth and environmental protection.



This situation places the Biden administration in a challenging position. The administration has pledged to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and promote clean energy, yet it must also consider the economic implications for communities dependent on coal mining. Federal policies on mining leases and environmental regulations will likely play a crucial role in the decision-making process.



The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future coal mining projects on public lands. It will provide insight into how the administration navigates the tension between environmental objectives and economic interests. Energy policy experts highlight the importance of monitoring this development, as it reflects broader national trends in energy production and environmental stewardship.



For further information about the environmental impact of coal mining and the debate over public land use, visit resources such as the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Alabama's Warrior Met Coal nears approval for a major expansion despite environmental and safety challenges.
An aerial view of Warrior Met

BERRY, Ala.—An Alabama mining company is finalizing plans to expand its operations in central Alabama, focusing on federally owned coal resources.

This expansion follows a settlement concerning the company’s environmental practices and ongoing safety violation allegations by regulators. The project challenges the Biden administration’s stance on phasing out federal coal mining in the Powder River Basin, Montana, and Wyoming.

Warrior Met Coal, a major U.S. metallurgical coal producer located in Brookwood, is close to obtaining regulatory approval for its Blue Creek facilities between Birmingham and Tuscaloosa, as per corporate filings.

If state and federal regulators approve, the expansion would be Alabama’s largest coal mining project in years, potentially boosting Warrior Met’s output by 60%. Public financial backing of over $400 million is expected to support coal exports for steelmaking purposes.

The project will employ the longwall mining method, where large machines shear coal from wide expanses, causing subsidence that impacts surface structures and ecosystems. Oak Grove, a town 25 miles from Warrior Met’s expansion, is already witnessing these effects, including business closures and a fatal home explosion due to methane.

Unlike Oak Grove, the Blue Creek expansion might involve mining federally-owned coal managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Over time, mineral rights in Alabama have been separated from surface ownership, leading to scenarios where the federal government holds mineral rights beneath privately-owned surface land.

In April, BLM announced an environmental assessment for Warrior Met’s plan to mine 14,040 acres of federal minerals in Tuscaloosa County. The proposal aims to extract about 57.5 million tons of recoverable coal.

In July, the Biden administration revealed plans to end coal leasing in Montana and Wyoming, a move praised by environmentalists but criticized by industry representatives. The administration now faces a decision on federal coal mining in Alabama.

MSHA reports indicate regular safety violations at Warrior Met’s Blue Creek facility, with 76 citations this year, 22 significant enough to potentially cause serious injuries. These violations relate to mining activities on private mineral rights.

Warrior Met is embroiled in litigation over environmental concerns, settling a case with Black Warrior Riverkeeper over leaks at its No. 7 Mine. The settlement mandates leak monitoring and a $250,000 payment for conservation purposes.

Gov. Kay Ivey announced a $500,000 grant to support water service installation for the Blue Creek mine, reflecting Alabama’s investment in the project, which also includes a $26.5 million tax abatement from Tuscaloosa County.

The extracted coal, primarily used for steel production, is exported overseas. Environmental groups continue to express concerns over infrastructure expansion, such as the $366 million Mobile Bay shipping channel project, highlighting the environmental impact of Alabama’s mining activities.

Federal reports have long recognized the environmental risks of mining in Alabama, including potential groundwater contamination. The BLM’s upcoming environmental assessment for the Blue Creek project will consider impacts on air quality, subsidence, and water resources.

Original Story at insideclimatenews.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024