Portland Debates Public Funding for Moda Center Renovations and Blazers

Portland's leaders are divided over using public funds for $600M Moda Center renovations, sparking resident debate.
station icon

Portland Considers Funding Options for Moda Center Renovations Amid Public Debate

In Portland, discussions are heating up over potential funding for the substantial renovations needed at the Moda Center. The Trail Blazers’ ownership has requested approximately $600 million in public funds to upgrade the city-owned arena, sparking a debate among residents.

The state legislature has already approved a financing package that could provide up to $365 million, sourced from future income taxes related to NBA activities. However, Portland officials are still exploring options to bridge the funding gap. These range from urban renewal and bonds to possibly using Portland Clean Energy Fund (PCEF) resources for energy-efficient improvements at the venue.

Opinions are divided among Portlanders regarding the use of public money. Some, like Erika, a local resident, argue that the investment is justified due to the economic and cultural significance of the Moda Center. “I think it’s a very fair trade-off because the Moda Center brings so much into that area and also downtown Portland,” she noted. The arena hosts various events, including Trail Blazers games, concerts, and charity functions, contributing to the city’s tourism and economic vibrancy.

RELATED: Portland review in 2024 detailed $505M in needed Moda renovations as team asks for $600M

Matt Cisneros, another resident, shares a similar sentiment, acknowledging the hesitance of taxpayers but emphasizing the long-term benefits. “I know that a lot of voters are like, ‘Why, why another one? Why can’t the ownership group or somebody come through?’ But yeah, I do think that the city is gonna be in the county, both please if you’re out there, commissioners. Both the county and the city. It sucks, it’s tough, but I think for the long-term good of the city. I think, I think we need to swallow that pill and make it happen,” he said.

Conversely, some residents, including Kai, originally from Minnesota, suggest that the burden of funding should fall primarily on the team owners, who possess the financial means. “I think it’s [censored] that whenever a stadium is built, this almost always happens. Billionaires have the money, right?” he remarked, although he admitted the economic value of retaining a professional sports team in the city.

Jasper Lasagna voiced concerns over taxpayers footing the bill for a privately owned franchise’s facility. “They have their own money, and I’m sure the people who are invested in the Blazers or the Minnesota General, I’m sure they have way more money than the average guy who probably does not have enough money or would want to,” she argued, advocating for voluntary contributions from those most invested in the team.

Environmental advocates, such as Damon Motz-Storey from the Sierra Club, have expressed reservations about diverting PCEF funds, which were intended for climate and clean energy initiatives. “This is not the right way to do it,” Motz-Storey stated, highlighting the importance of adhering to existing oversight processes and the potential negative impact on other community projects.

While city officials continue to deliberate on the best funding strategy, the debate underscores the complexities of balancing economic development with fiscal responsibility and community priorities. Discussions are expected to continue in the coming weeks.

RELATED: Should climate money renovate Moda Center? Portland leaders weigh in

Original Story at katu.com