Tutu Alicante recalled a tragic personal story during a recent webinar, highlighting systemic issues in Equatorial Guinea’s healthcare amid economic growth from oil. In 1996, his sister died from an untreated ectopic pregnancy due to lack of power and medical professionals at a local hospital. Years later, his father’s death mirrored the same conditions, despite the country’s economic boom following Mobil’s oil discovery.
Alicante, who leads EG Justice, a U.S. nonprofit tackling corruption in Equatorial Guinea, shared this account to underscore new securities filings’ significance. For the first time, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission reports reveal payments from extractive companies to global governments, aiming to expose corruption and inequitable contracts that benefit elites without improving citizens’ lives.
The disclosures unveiled billions in corporate payments, including taxes and royalties, from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and others. Alicante emphasized the life-and-death stakes for many citizens amid this wealth disparity. Notably, Equatoguineans can now see that ExxonMobil paid their government $189.2 million last year, a small portion of the $32 billion paid globally.
The rules apply to oil, gas, and mining entities filing U.S. reports, with some companies already disclosing payments due to overseas rules. The aim is to enable civil society to compare company payments with government-reported data, raising red flags where discrepancies appear.
Aubrey Menard from Oxfam America noted striking tax payment differences across countries, highlighting potential unfair deals for the U.S., a significant Exxon and Chevron production location. Exxon, for example, paid the United Arab Emirates $5.6 billion, far more than to the U.S. federal government.
Chevron’s payments also showed similar patterns, with more funds directed to other countries compared to the U.S. Exxon and Chevron argue that different tax and royalty structures complicate direct comparisons.
Zorka Milin, of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency Coalition, criticized the industry’s opposition to more detailed state and local payment disclosures that could enhance transparency. Despite missing some detailed reporting elements, these disclosures can initiate important conversations about payment fairness in the U.S.
As the U.S. debates corporate tax cuts, these revelations could influence discussions, particularly around fossil fuel tax benefits. Milin highlighted the potential embarrassment for companies due to these disclosures, which they had opposed.
Simon Taylor from Global Witness stated that many corporate concessions remain predatory, unfavorable for the host states. These reports, required under an amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, could inform future policies and reflect on the industry’s influence on regulatory processes.
Original Story at insideclimatenews.org