Completion of Dogger Bank A Offshore Wind Farm Delayed to Late 2025

SSE announced the Dogger Bank A wind farm's completion is delayed to late 2025, but returns remain unaffected.
Dogger Bank A Offshore Wind Farm Completion Slips to Second Half of 2025

SSE has announced a delay in completing Dogger Bank A, the first phase of the UK’s Dogger Bank Wind Farm. The new expected completion is in the second half of 2025, later than the initially projected first half of the year.

In its interim earnings report on 3 October, SSE stated that despite the delay, the project’s returns remain unaffected. The company reported that its renewables performance for the first half of the year exceeded previous years, aligning with expectations due to favorable weather conditions. By 30 September 2024, output reached approximately 5.3 TWh, a 44% increase from the same period last year.

SSE previously reported delays in February 2024, citing challenging weather impacting wind turbine installation, along with vessel availability and supply chain issues.

In early May, a turbine blade at Dogger Bank A was damaged. GE Vernova investigated and found the damage resulted from an installation error isolated to the single affected blade. Later, another blade failed during commissioning. GE Vernova’s analysis concluded it was unrelated to installation or manufacturing faults.

Dogger Bank A will feature 95 GE Haliade-X 13 MW wind turbines and is the first of three 1.2 GW phases. Upon completion, it is set to become the world’s largest offshore wind farm. The project is a joint venture by SSE Renewables, Equinor, and Vårgrønn.

Original Story at www.offshorewind.biz

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.