Creation Covenant Alliance

The Connection Between Voting Rights and Climate Justice

By protecting and expanding voting rights, we can ensure climate policies are developed with equity and justice in mind.
Voters voting in polling place.

By protecting and expanding voting rights, we can ensure that climate policies are developed with equity and justice in mind

lisareiser

Sat, 2024-08-10 02:00

Voters voting in polling place.

Photo by Hill Street Studios/Getty Images

Ben Jealous
Aug 10 2024

Distributed by Trice Edney Newswire

As we celebrate the 59th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act this month, it is important to remember a crucial fact: The only way to tackle the complex challenges of our time is with a democracy that is responsive to the people it represents.

From racial justice to economic opportunity, gun violence to health care, education to reproductive freedom, no issue stands as an exception. Our ability to tackle the climate crisis—one of our most urgent challenges—depends on the strength of our democracy.

The Biden–Harris administration has made historic progress on climate action. The Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law are key policies in the fight against fossil-fuel-driven climate change. Numerous executive orders and agency rulemakings from the administration represent bold climate action. To continue this progress, our democracy must serve the interests of the many, not just the few.

The fight against climate change is not just a scientific or environmental issue but also a deeply political and democratic one. The climate crisis is a global emergency that demands immediate attention and action, and it is the people who have the power to drive and influence our leaders and policymakers to prioritize that action.

The fossil fuel industry, with its immense wealth, has shaped our democracy to serve its interests. We need to strengthen our democracy to better protect voting rights, make voting easier, curtail gerrymandering, and reduce the corrupting influence of money in politics. The power in a democracy should rest with the people and the voice of the voter, not a small handful of executives and investors benefiting from one planet-killing industry.

Transitioning to a clean energy economy is not just a moral imperative, it is an investment in America. It reduces pollution, making the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the soil where our food grows cleaner, safer, and healthier. It is also better for consumers and ratepayers. Renewable energy like solar and wind are already more affordable and resilient than fossil fuels, and that gap is widening. The same goes for electric vehicles.

Speeding up the transition will continue to create jobs, ensure American competitiveness in the next economy, and strengthen our economy. We have already seen well over 300,000 jobs created by the Biden-Harris administration’s investments in clean energy.

Someone who understood this was the late congressman John Lewis. Representative Lewis was a champion for strengthening American democracy and protecting voters’ rights. In his final years, he said, “I do not agree with the dark vision of America’s future [then-President Trump] described that pits accepting responsibility for our environmental impact against the economic stability and vitality of our country.… The rest of the world has seen the economic and environmental benefit of clean energy, and they will leave us behind.”

As we remember Representative Lewis’s legacy this summer—between last month’s anniversary of his passing and the anniversary of the Voting Rights Act this month—let us remember those words as a call to action. There is no conflict between economic prosperity and fighting the climate crisis. The climate fight is a conflict between the tiny number of extremely wealthy and powerful people who benefit from the fossil fuel status quo and the rest of humanity.

By protecting and expanding voting rights—with bills like the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and the Freedom to Vote Act—we can ensure that all voices are heard and that climate policies are developed with equity and justice in mind. When marginalized communities, including communities of color, low-income communities, and Indigenous communities, have a seat at the table and a voice in the democratic process, they are more likely to push for climate policies that prioritize their needs and interests.

Moreover, the same systems and structures that perpetuate the climate crisis also undermine democracy and the rule of law. Democracy is a climate issue, and climate is a democracy issue. By addressing the climate crisis, we can also tackle the underlying democratic deficits that perpetuate inequality and injustice.

Climate justice requires a democratic system that is accountable, transparent, and responsive to the needs and demands of all people, particularly those most affected by climate change. By strengthening democracy, we can ensure that climate policies are developed with the participation and consent of all affected communities.

Let us work together to build a democracy that serves the people, not just the powerful. Let us prioritize voting rights, climate action, and environmental justice. The future of our planet depends on it.

More stories about:

voting rights

Original Story at www.sierraclub.org

Trending News

Mississippi River Faces Persistent Saltwater Intrusion, Region Seeks Long-Term Solutions



For the third consecutive year, the Mississippi River is experiencing significant saltwater intrusion, prompting local communities and environmental experts to search for sustainable solutions. This recurring issue arises as the river’s flow decreases, allowing saltwater to move upstream and threaten drinking water supplies. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is actively involved in addressing this problem, employing temporary measures like saltwater barriers to mitigate the impact on affected areas.



Saltwater infiltration poses serious risks to public health and agriculture, as freshwater sources become compromised. The situation is exacerbated by prolonged periods of drought, which have reduced freshwater flow in the Mississippi River. According to the National Weather Service, drought conditions have worsened due to climate change, increasing the frequency and severity of saltwater intrusion events.



Local authorities are collaborating with federal agencies to explore permanent solutions. Among the proposed strategies are enhanced levee systems and improved water management techniques. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of long-term infrastructure projects to prevent further saltwater encroachment. Additionally, community leaders are advocating for increased funding to support these initiatives and safeguard the region’s water resources.



The impact of saltwater intrusion extends beyond drinking water concerns, affecting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Farmers in the region have reported crop damage due to elevated salinity levels in irrigation water. The Natural Resources Conservation Service is working with farmers to implement adaptive practices, such as planting salt-tolerant crops and improving soil management techniques.



As the Mississippi River continues to face challenges from saltwater intrusion, stakeholders emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts and innovative solutions. The ongoing threat underscores the need for comprehensive planning and investment to protect one of America’s most vital waterways from the impacts of climate change and environmental stressors.

November 19, 2024



Environmental activists have raised concerns over the fossil fuel sector’s significant impact on COP29, the latest United Nations Climate Change Conference. Activists argue that the industry’s presence diverts focus from critical climate actions.



The conference, designed to promote global climate agreements, faces criticism for allowing fossil fuel companies to participate extensively. Environmental groups claim these companies undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources.



According to Climate Action Network, fossil fuel representatives have increased their lobbying activities, aiming to weaken climate policies. These industries allegedly influence negotiations, leading to watered-down commitments that fail to address the urgency of climate change effectively.



Experts suggest that the influence of these companies stems from financial contributions and longstanding relationships with decision-makers. Critics argue that this affects the conference’s ability to enforce meaningful climate change regulations.



During the event, several protests highlighted the need for transparency and a stronger focus on sustainable energy solutions. Activists are calling for increased participation of renewable energy stakeholders in future conferences.



The controversy surrounding fossil fuel involvement at COP29 underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing industrial interests with the global imperative to combat climate change.



November 19, 2024